Hi, There appears to be a bug in DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90. It is probably only triggered when the intel compilers. gfortran and intel seem to have very different internal implementations of fortran90 allocatable arrays. Developers, can you check if the attached patch makes sense? It will not fix the case of a 3d da with dof>1 since F90Array4dAccess is not implemented. Other than that, it seems to fix ex11f90 under linux and mac OS Blaise On Jul 2, 2012, at 5:41 PM, TAY wee-beng wrote:
On 2/7/2012 2:49 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:58 AM, TAY wee-beng <[email protected]> wrote: Hi,
I have used DMDACreate2d for my code and then use:
call DMLocalToGlobalBegin(da,b_rhs_semi_local,INSERT_VALUES,b_rhs_semi_global,ierr)
call DMLocalToGlobalEnd(da,b_rhs_semi_local,INSERT_VALUES,b_rhs_semi_global,ierr)
to construct the global DM vector b_rhs_semi_global
Now I want to get the values with ghost values in a 2d array locally which is declared as:
real(8), allocatable :: array2d(:,:)
I guess I should use DMDAGetGhostCorners to get the corressponding indices and allocate it. But what should I do next? How can I use something like VecGetArrayF90 to get to the pointer to access the local vector?
I can't use DMDAVecGetArrayF90/DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90 since I'm using intel fortran and they can't work. I can't use gfortran at the moment since I've problems with HYPRE with gfortran in 3D.
Are you certain of this? That used to be true, but the current version should work for any F90.
Matt
I just tested 3.3-p1 and it still doesn't work (example ex11f90 in dm). Is there a chance petsc-dev can work?
Thanks
-- Yours sincerely,
TAY wee-beng
-- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener
-- Department of Mathematics and Center for Computation & Technology Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA Tel. +1 (225) 578 1612, Fax +1 (225) 578 4276 http://www.math.lsu.edu/~bourdin