Ok get rid of them and we'll live with the consequences :-) barry On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:57 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:

On 10 March 2011 21:45, Barry Smith <[email protected]> wrote:

...

On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:22 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:

...

On 10 March 2011 20:57, Ethan Coon <[email protected]> wrote:

...

Attached patch makes this change, and updates the website with the API change.

Also it fixes a few stray 'DAPeriodicType's in conf/adic*.init, which I'm guessing was just missed in the previous change to DMDAPeriodicType?

Do we really need backward compatibility DMDA_XYZPERIODIC and friends?

Is the | business all fine and dandy for Fortran? If so then I agree we should remove the "noise".

Well, you can use '+' (with a bit care) in any Fortran, right?. This is the way the MPI standard does things for some enumerations (file modes, RMA assertions).

However, if DMDA_XYZPERIODIC and friends do no go away because of Fortran issues, then we should definitely define DMDA_{XY|XZ|YZ}GHOSTED.

-- Lisandro Dalcin --------------- CIMEC (INTEC/CONICET-UNL) Predio CONICET-Santa Fe Colectora RN 168 Km 472, Paraje El Pozo 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina Tel: +54-342-4511594 (ext 1011) Tel/Fax: +54-342-4511169