On 4 April 2011 22:48, Satish Balay <[email protected]> wrote:

There is clang and clang++ - but still they insist on throwing this warning.

When I invoke clang++ - I want c++. So I'm not sure whats so ambiguous that they should throw this warning.

And what does this depricate mean? That  'clang++ foo.c' will create C code?

Then why have both clang and clang++?

$ file /usr/bin/clang++ /usr/bin/clang++: symbolic link to `clang' They should use argv[0] to dispatch C/C++, but it seems this is not the case. -- Lisandro Dalcin --------------- CIMEC (INTEC/CONICET-UNL) Predio CONICET-Santa Fe Colectora RN 168 Km 472, Paraje El Pozo 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina Tel: +54-342-4511594 (ext 1011) Tel/Fax: +54-342-4511169