Re: Should PetscObjectName be collective?
16 Nov
2009
16 Nov
'09
12:29 p.m.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Barry Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
Ok, we could just put the "counter" into the MPI attribute and then just have uniqueness of the names within each communicator. This would solve Jed's problem cleanly.
I agree. +1 on this.
We don't have any way of requiring the user to use Unique names anyways.
With great power comes great responsibility... -- Lisandro Dalcín --------------- Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC) Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594
6114
Age (days ago)
6114
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Lisandro Dalcin