Re: [petsc-dev] various dot products messed up for complex numbers?
18 Apr
2012
18 Apr
'12
12:28 a.m.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 20:17, Barry Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
The truth is likely that except for CG most of the methods were coded without regard to complex and are likely wrong but not necessarily wrong in a consistent way or even self-consistently wrong.
This fixes Alexander Grayver's reported problem with TFQMR. I still don't know if CG is correct, but it should be easy to check.
5230
Age (days ago)
5230
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Jed Brown