Re: [petsc-dev] Question about MPICH device we use
BTW: Last we compared performance [many years ago] the difference was not a factor of 2 - but a few percentage points. Which petsc example can we re-run to compare? Satish On Wed, 22 Jul 2020, Satish Balay via petsc-dev wrote:
Primarily because ch3:sock performance does not degrade in oversubscribe mode - which is developer friendly - i.e on your laptop.
And folks doing optimized runs should use a properly tuned MPI for their setup anyway.
In this case --download-mpich-device=ch3:nemesis is likely appropriate if using --download-mpich [and not using a separate/optimized MPI]
Having defaults that satisfy all use cases is not practical.
Satish
On Wed, 22 Jul 2020, Matthew Knepley wrote:
We default to ch3:sock. Scott MacLachlan just had a long thread on the Firedrake list where it ended up that reconfiguring using ch3:nemesis had a 2x performance boost on his 16-core proc, and noticeable effect on the 4 core speedup.
Why do we default to sock?
Thanks,
Matt
participants (1)
-
Satish Balay