15 Nov
2011
15 Nov
'11
5:37 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 17:34, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote:
I am not sure I like this since it creates a circular dependency in the libraries.
Like how MATSCHURCOMPLEMENT creates a circular dependency? Which it doesn't because the implementation lives in KSP. This would be the same, the implementation would live in TS. But I don't like because the user needs to provide something else anyway, and the most natural interface for that thing they need to provide is TSIJacobian.
5384
Age (days ago)
5384
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Jed Brown