15 Nov
2011
15 Nov
'11
5:37 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 17:34, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote:
I am not sure I like this since it creates a circular dependency in the libraries.
Like how MATSCHURCOMPLEMENT creates a circular dependency? Which it doesn't because the implementation lives in KSP. This would be the same, the implementation would live in TS. But I don't like because the user needs to provide something else anyway, and the most natural interface for that thing they need to provide is TSIJacobian.