We need to find out if per file comments are possible, but just not supported by the tool. Matt On 7/25/06, Satish Balay <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Barry Smith wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Satish Balay wrote:
Yes - not having file comments makes it more difficult to go back in file history.
But one way to look at it is - for some of these senarios - it meanas multiple changesets should be created [with the correct grouping of changes] instead of the atempted single changeset.
Yes, the problem with this is that there is no decent way of making multiple change-sets.
- quit emacs without typing in any comments [so no commit is done] - 'hg status' to get the list of modified files - hg commit file1 file2 [ to make the appropriate changeset]
I use 'hg ct' though..
If I could just edit out the files I did not want when doing the comment for a commit it would make life a MILLION times better (could that be added?).
I'll check on this on the mercurial list..
Satish
Barry
And perhaps some comments can actually go into the code.
Satish
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Barry Smith wrote:
Not having file by file comments for changesets is starting to annoy me.
Barry
-- "Failure has a thousand explanations. Success doesn't need one" -- Sir Alec Guiness