October 2012 - swift-bugs - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

[Bug 714] New: Give more information for "could not convert" error message
by bugzilla-daemon＠mcs.anl.gov 19 Jun '15

19 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/show_bug.cgi?id=714 Summary: Give more information for "could not convert" error message Product: Swift Version: 0.93 Platform: PC OS/Version: Mac OS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: SwiftScript language AssignedTo: davidk(a)ci.uchicago.edu ReportedBy: wilde(a)mcs.anl.gov Swift dies with the following message: Execution failed: Could not convert value to number: nan Provide at least the built-in function name and ideally the line number of the failing operation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 710] New: Keyword argument passing doesnt seem to work as described in user guide
by bugzilla-daemon＠mcs.anl.gov 06 Mar '15

06 Mar '15

https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/show_bug.cgi?id=710 Summary: Keyword argument passing doesnt seem to work as described in user guide Product: Swift Version: 0.93 Platform: PC OS/Version: Mac OS Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P4 Component: SwiftScript language AssignedTo: hategan(a)mcs.anl.gov ReportedBy: wilde(a)mcs.anl.gov (need to provide test cases) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 801] New: Built-in mappers should give an error when an unrecognized parameter is specified.
by bugzilla-daemon＠mcs.anl.gov 18 Oct '14

18 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/show_bug.cgi?id=801 Summary: Built-in mappers should give an error when an unrecognized parameter is specified. Product: Swift Version: 0.93 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: SwiftScript language AssignedTo: davidk(a)ci.uchicago.edu ReportedBy: wilde(a)mcs.anl.gov >From user R. Weiss: "So like I said, it turns out this whole issue boils down to a typo. I would suggest that swift should throw up some sort of warning if you pass something to one of the pre-defined mappers that is not defined as one of its parameters. I would have expected swift to complain that "sufix" is an unknown parameter of filesys_mapper." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 752] New: Coaster provider does not retry worker launches on qsub failures
by bugzilla-daemon＠mcs.anl.gov 18 Oct '14

18 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/show_bug.cgi?id=752 Summary: Coaster provider does not retry worker launches on qsub failures Product: Swift Version: 0.93 Platform: PC OS/Version: Mac OS Status: ASSIGNED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Providers AssignedTo: hategan(a)mcs.anl.gov ReportedBy: wilde(a)mcs.anl.gov CC: hategan(a)mcs.anl.gov, davidk(a)ci.uchicago.edu, wozniak(a)mcs.anl.gov If a qsub to start a worker.pl job fails (in this case, due to the user having exceeded the maximum number of concurrently allowed job submissions, 32 on Eureka) then the coaster provider never tries again to start workers for those coaster slots. Hence, when the user is running multiple swift runs concurrently, and they fluctuate in the number of active workers, the swift run that encounters the worker failures stays forever at a very low active worker count. In the current situation, it stays so low (eg 1 worker out of an expected 32) that the run needs to be killed and restarted in order to get a sufficient number of workers. Logs are on eureka in /home/wilde/LZ/runNNN where NNN is between 020 and 058. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 722] New: fprintf presents hanging situation
by bugzilla-daemon＠mcs.anl.gov 18 Oct '14

18 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/show_bug.cgi?id=722 Summary: fprintf presents hanging situation Product: Swift Version: 0.93 Platform: PC OS/Version: Mac OS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: General AssignedTo: hategan(a)mcs.anl.gov ReportedBy: jonmon(a)utexas.edu CC: wilde(a)mcs.anl.gov If using %i and passing a float variable in the argument list, seems to have fprintf hang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 688] New: Testing env interactions
by bugzilla-daemon＠mcs.anl.gov 18 Oct '14

18 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/show_bug.cgi?id=688 Summary: Testing env interactions Product: Swift Version: trunk Platform: PC OS/Version: Mac OS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Testing AssignedTo: jonmon(a)utexas.edu ReportedBy: jonmon(a)utexas.edu CC: wilde(a)mcs.anl.gov, skenny(a)uchicago.edu, davidk(a)ci.uchicago.edu, wozniak(a)mcs.anl.gov, ketan(a)mcs.anl.gov Testing and documenting interactions with setting environment variables using the env profile. Justin I believe had specific testing situation and questions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 666] New: Ability to have sitewise provider-staging policy in a single run
by bugzilla-daemon＠mcs.anl.gov 12 Jul '14

12 Jul '14

https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/show_bug.cgi?id=666 Summary: Ability to have sitewise provider-staging policy in a single run Product: Swift Version: 0.93 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Providers AssignedTo: hategan(a)mcs.anl.gov ReportedBy: ketan(a)mcs.anl.gov CC: hategan(a)mcs.anl.gov, davidk(a)ci.uchicago.edu, wozniak(a)mcs.anl.gov In the SCEC application ported to TG and OSG, the TG part runs using the SGE provider which does not need provider staging while the OSG part of the script needs provider staging. Currently, a script-wide single config file dictates whether to have provider-staging or not. However, in cases like this, it is desirable to have provider staging set site-wise. So that, with a sites.xml property, one may specify provider staging policy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 787] New: Coasters looses slots on large-scale Cray tests
by bugzilla-daemon＠mcs.anl.gov 29 May '14

29 May '14

https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/show_bug.cgi?id=787 Summary: Coasters looses slots on large-scale Cray tests Product: Swift Version: 0.93 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Providers AssignedTo: hategan(a)mcs.anl.gov ReportedBy: wilde(a)mcs.anl.gov CC: hategan(a)mcs.anl.gov, davidk(a)ci.uchicago.edu, wozniak(a)mcs.anl.gov Created an attachment (id=299) --> (http://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/attachment.cgi?id=299) Image of nodes running during test on 18K-core Cray "hera" See attached slide - lost 2K of 18K cores. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 730] New: swift command gives error message when run with explicit path
by bugzilla-daemon＠mcs.anl.gov 26 Feb '14

26 Feb '14

https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/show_bug.cgi?id=730 Summary: swift command gives error message when run with explicit path Product: Swift Version: 0.93 Platform: PC OS/Version: Mac OS Status: ASSIGNED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: General AssignedTo: davidk(a)ci.uchicago.edu ReportedBy: wilde(a)mcs.anl.gov When you run the 0.93 swift command from an explicit path, it gets confused when generating the "no sites file" message: login2$ swift-0.93/bin/swift -version no sites file specified, setting to default: which: no swift in (/soft/apache-ant/1.8.2/etc/sites.xml Error: XML parsing error in which: no swift in (/soft/apache-ant/1.8.2/etc/sites.xml which: no swift in (/soft/apache-ant/1.8.2/etc/sites.xml is [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'which: no swift in (/soft/apache-ant/1.8.2/etc/sites.xml' Swift 0.93 swift-r5483 cog-r3339 when run from PATH its OK: login2$ PATH=$(pwd)/swift/bin:$PATH login2$ swift -version no sites file specified, setting to default: /home/wilde/AndreysOptimizer/src/swift/etc/sites.xml Swift 0.93 swift-r5483 cog-r3339 login2$ --- While fixing this, also fix: dont generate this message at all if user is just doing -version. Also dont generate swift.log file in this (or any???) case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 835] New: Rename jobsPerNode to appsPerNode
by bugzilla-daemon＠mcs.anl.gov 26 Feb '14

26 Feb '14

https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/show_bug.cgi?id=835 Summary: Rename jobsPerNode to appsPerNode Product: Swift Version: trunk Platform: PC OS/Version: Mac OS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Providers AssignedTo: davidk(a)ci.uchicago.edu ReportedBy: wilde(a)mcs.anl.gov CC: hategan(a)mcs.anl.gov, davidk(a)ci.uchicago.edu, wozniak(a)mcs.anl.gov >From J. Margoliash: > Who should I talk to if I want to recommend that jobsPerNode be > renamed appsPerNode or appCallsPerNode? It really is confusing to > conflate jobs sent to the execution provider (which consist of blocks > of coaster worker initializing code, if I understand correctly) with > appCalls (which circumvent the job-scheduler dilemma via already set > up coaster workers). I'd be happy to voice this opinion on behalf of > swift users if it might make a difference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 2