- Safety - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

FW: Issues on Traffic safety on Outer Circle Rd East of North Gate
by Dyrkacz, Gary R. 17 Oct '11

17 Oct '11

Dave, Please see the note below from Phil Rash. It looks like the second email and copying Metta finally resulted in some action. Hopefully more will be coming. Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333 From: Rash, Philip C. Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 3:30 PM To: Dyrkacz, Gary R. Cc: Metta, David K.; Stine, Gail Y.; Dely, Gregory; Russell, Edward F.; Gradle, Thomas A.; Rada, Sylvia M.; Rash, Philip C.; Schumann, Craig; Sullivan, Casey J. Subject: RE: Issues on Traffic safety on Outer Circle Rd East of North Gate Hi Gary, I did see that Security has placed the speed limit radar detector announcer on the south/east bound lane after the curve. I recently traversed the curve from both directions to get the feel of the curve at below and at the speed limit. This road/curve was modified many years ago when the entrance to Lab was changed. This change increased the rate of turn on the curve. Also, recently the Laboratory paved the shoulder of this road to provide safer area for pedestrians and bicyclist to traverse the road. While traversing the curve in both directions in my car, I did not feel the g-forces were excessive for drivers using the road. There is also a clear view of the curve for traffic moving north and south on the road around the curve. The issues associated with the safety concerns are likely as you have alluded to: Talking on the phone while driving and speeding. However, I will be conducting a traffic Safety Committee in late October. We will review the concerns you have brought up. The speed limit was reduced on Northgate Road as it approaches the Northgate entrance because it is a gate entrance and for excessive speeds on the curve. That curves seems to be sharper. Phil Rash From: Dyrkacz, Gary R. Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 1:46 PM To: Rash, Philip C. Cc: Metta, David K.; Stine, Gail Y. Subject: FW: Issues on Traffic safety on Outer Circle Rd East of North Gate Hi Phil, Is anything being done about the condition below? I had another report today on this same issue noted below. In addition to this speeding problem, three incidents of people either texting or on cell phones while driving around this same curve were noted, coming from either direction. In one case, the claim was the car was drifting toward the individual walking on the side of the road. There were no license numbers noted, only descriptions of the two of the vehicles as a black SUV and a small white Lexus. Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333 From: Dyrkacz, Gary R. Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:35 PM To: Rash, Philip C. Subject: Issues on Traffic safety on Outer Circle Rd East of North Gate HI Phil, An associate Division Director brought to my attention that he believes staff are taking the relatively sharp curve east of the North Gate entrance on the Outer Circle at fairly high speed. They may not see someone quickly enough who may be walking along the side of the road. As someone who regularly walks along the road for exercise, the Director felt that this could be an issue waiting to become an incident. I know what he means, because I often drive this road to get to the East area at lunch time to fly my model airplane. A couple of times, I realized I was taking this curve a bit fast, and have learned to slow down when I come to the curve. However, I have seen other people take that curve fairly fast as well. The Director suggested maybe putting out a speed monitor to help staff realize they need to throttle back. Of course, a speed trap might stop the problem real fast, but he was okay with the more gentle approach first. Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333

1 0

FW: Safety
by Dyrkacz, Gary R. 05 Oct '11

05 Oct '11

Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333 From: Rick Stevens [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 7:55 PM To: Collis, Scott M. Cc: Sisterson, Douglas L.; Stickels, Judith K.; Jim Feigl; Dyrkacz, Gary R. Subject: Re: Safety Thanks Scott. We will see what can be done to improve this. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 4, 2011, at 15:33, Scott Collis <scollis(a)anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: G'day Rick, Doug told us to take a pic and send it to you if we saw a safety concern. I regularly cycle to work and get changed in the level 2 locker and shower room, the way the showers are designed means that the flow into the drain is non-ideal and there is no "lip" at the entrance to the shower to act as a barrier out to the change rooms... the result is a hard to see slippery puddle... Ok when you are barefoot post shower but diabolical when you are in slick shoes on the way in... There have been occasions when this puddle has reached all the way around to the lockers (gross when you step in it with socks on.. ewww!) Cheers, Scott -- Dr Scott Collis ARM Precipitation Radar Translator ARM Climate Research Facility Computing, Environment, and Life Sciences Directorate Argonne National Laboratory Cell: +1 630 235 8025 Office: +1 630 252 0550 http://radar.arm.gov <IMG_0753.jpg>

1 0

The steps outside 240
by Dyrkacz, Gary R. 28 Sep '11

28 Sep '11

>From Pete Beckman at CELS DD meeting: 9/28/2011. Steps outside the front (south) entrance are a bit difficult to realize as steps when coming out of the building in full sunlight. Need some way of ,making clear there is a set of steps to negotiate. Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333

1 0

FW: B240 Safety Items
by Dyrkacz, Gary R. 26 Sep '11

26 Sep '11

Two more issues... I have been unable to locate whether the TCSB Safety Notification Plan was issued to all staff or management in 240. Has it been "approved" and disseminated and I just missed the dissemination? Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333 From: Gasper, William R. Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 4:33 PM To: Dyrkacz, Gary R. Subject: B240 Safety Items Gary, One recent event brought out two safety items in Building 240: 1. Exterior window washing was being performed directly above the main entrance to the building. There were no signs or warnings posted to alert pedestrians of potential hazards above. 2. Stop work authority for non-Argonne personnel has not been communicated to Building 240 occupants. Argonne stresses that all employees have immediate stop work authority when an unsafe activity is encountered. It is not clear what is appropriate when an Argonne employee witnesses a contractor performing an unsafe activity. Bill

2 2

Fwd: Area for Improvement Regarding Safety (as well as other areas)
by Silvia Palomino 22 Sep '11

22 Sep '11

-Silvia Begin forwarded message: From: Rick Stevens <stevens(a)anl.gov> Date: September 22, 2011 4:46:09 PM CDT To: William E. Allcock <allcock(a)alcf.anl.gov> Cc: "Michael E. Papka" <papka(a)anl.gov>, "Gary R. R. Dyrkacz" <dyrkacz(a)anl.gov > Subject: Re: Area for Improvement Regarding Safety (as well as other areas) Thanks Bill for your thoughtful analysis and comments. I'll pass this on and see if we can make some improvements in the training depth for WPC. Best, -Rick On Sep 22, 2011, at 1:24 PM, William E. Allcock wrote: > Rick, > > When all the CELS managers met to discuss safety, I understood you > to say that we should send you safety related things that we felt > could benefit from higher level management support. I believe that > an area that is badly lacking is the systems, training, and tools > around safety and work planning and controls. > > Given the mission critical nature of safety, I would argue that the > current training is completely inadequate. The online training we > get doesn't even qualify as the tip of the iceberg, it is more like > an ice cube. I have learned over the past year or so that many of > the POs I have written have been done incorrectly. It is not > because I don't want to follow the rules, or I am trying to slide by > with the minimum. It is because I simply did not know the Argonne > procedures that applied. Note that safety was not ignored. Thought > and care for safety was there, but it was not done to procedure, > might have violated ANL safety rules I did not know about (see below > for an example) and documentation was not done that in the case of > an incident would be all important. > > The ALCF operations team has dramatically improved in this area > because Cheetah (Bowen Goletz) took the initiative and has literally > spent man weeks sifting through the documentation, calling people, > and generally deciphering the system. The average employee just > isn't going to, and should not have to, expend that kind of effort. > > I believe that the training for WPC, in particular the graded > approach, should be live in a classroom, and it should include the > various SMEs, so people have a name and a face when they need help. > It is a complicated system and there is a lot of gray and room for > interpretation. Exercises, preferably taken from actual situations > here at ANL should be assigned and people should have to develop a > Job Safety Analysis, apply the graded approach and utilize the WPC > system to properly generate the required documents. > > The safety rules are scatted across numerous documents, forms are > hard to find, if you even know they exist, and it can be difficult > to understand the correct way to fill them out if you do find > them. Some standardization, simplification, and organization would > help immensely. Just as an example, we recently discovered that > there is an ANL rule requiring a hard hat if you are working on > anything higher than 4' off the ground. That means anyone who ever > pulled a server out of a rack that was more than 4' off the ground > and didn't have a hard hat on was violating the safety rules. This > is NOT common practice in data centers based on what I have seen and > based on conversations with vendors, so since I was not trained in > this ANL specific thing, I didn't know about it, and I never > enforced it (we are now). > > The WPC system is difficult to use. I will say that Cheetah has > indicated the people working on it are eager to help and try to be > responsive, but they are simply understaffed. Funding and effort to > improve this system would pay huge dividends down the road. I don't > particularly care what the system is, but we need a system, it needs > to be usable, and we need to be trained to use it. I would also > point out that Cheetah contacted one of the SMEs and asked him to > approve a WPC document. His approval was the first time he had ever > logged into the WPC system. It is a single data point, but this > makes me wonder if the WPC system is being used the way it should be. > > I mentioned this could be applied to other areas as well. A closely > related area is the Quality Assurance level for POs. You have to > classify every PO as QA level A-D. D is for things like office > supplies that you simply verify quantities. A is mission critical. > When we order big machines like Intrepid or Mira, they should be QA > level A. I am told that Intrepid was marked D. I believe Mira was > marked a C. I don't believe there was any malfeasance intended, the > people involved simply didn't know any better because they had not > been adequately trained. > > For both areas, I would also argue that the system of checks and > balances broke down somewhere (or many places). How were these POs > going through with obviously wrong QA levels? The safety issues are > harder to tell, because you need to understand the tasks, but > perhaps spot checks, or internal audits? > > Anyway, I believe most people at ANL, and I can assure you it is > true for the ALCF operations team, want to work safely and to follow > proper procedure and to do our job to the best of our ability. I > believe that improvements in the training such as I have suggested > would greatly improve peoples ability to do so. > > Let me know if you have any questions or comments. > > Bill > -------------------------------------------------------------- > William (Bill) E. Allcock > allcock(a)alcf.anl.gov > Office 1123, Bldg 240 > 9700 S. Cass Ave > Argonne, IL 60439 > Google Voice: 630-233-4865 (preferred) > Office: 630-252-7573 > Fax: 630-252-6585 > > > The test of courage comes when we are in the minority. > The test of tolerance comes when we are in the majority. > - Ralph W. Sockman > Rick Stevens Associate Laboratory Director Computing, Environment and Life Science Argonne National Laboratory Professor of Computer Science Senior Fellow Computation Institute Senior Fellow Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology The University of Chicago stevens(a)anl.gov stevens(a)ci.uchicago.edu (v) 630-252-3378 (f) 630-252-6333

1 0

FW: that cooking smell
by Dyrkacz, Gary R. 19 Sep '11

19 Sep '11

Colliers earlier decided that none was needed for the Panini press. Judy indicated the press is really not used much except around lunch time. There are many food smells on a regular basis in this building that are not due to Guckenheimer. Coming in from the outside one can often detect many odors. The open structure promotes dispersion of any food smells being prepared in the roughly 16 oases because there is no specific venting for the oases. Complaints about air quality is a continuing and general phenomena is this building, (not counting the individual who gets migraines from rf). We seem to have an abundance of hypersensitive staff in this building, with more allergies and asthmatic triggers than seems normal. (At least I heard very few in any of the other buildings or wings that I have lived in. Do we consider these kinds of question as nuisance questions or do we seriously consider this as a medical concern that we must respond to by some intervention. I am sure to these people, these are real concerns. At any rate, these people deserve some answer to their question. BTW, I doubt IH can do a whole lot about this particular issue. Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333 From: Judy Stickels [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 12:49 PM To: Ruscic, Lillian Cc: Dyrkacz, Gary R. Subject: Re: that cooking smell I'm waiting to hear back from Guckenheimer. Terry e-mailed me about this in the last week or so and I questioned whether or not one was needed for the small panini press. That's all we have as far as cooking. On Sep 19, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Lillian Ruscic wrote: Gary and Judy, Has this issue been raised before, and is there anything that can be done to help Terry? Lillian Ruscic ESH QA Coordinator for CELS, LCF & MCS B240 AES 2-4471 ________________________________ From: "Terry Disz" <disz(a)mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> To: "Lillian Ruscic" <lruscic(a)anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 12:01:23 PM Subject: that cooking smell The greasy cooking smell from downstairs gives me a headache every day and makes my eyes water. They are cooking without proper ventilation and it affects some of us who have allergies and a history of asthma. I hope you can fix this. terry Judy Stickels Manager, TCS Building Operations MCS/240, Rm. 3142 Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 630-252-3369 (voice) stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>

1 0

FW: Safety Items from Facility Inspection
by Dyrkacz, Gary R. 19 Sep '11

19 Sep '11

Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333 From: Gasper, William R. Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 4:13 PM To: Dyrkacz, Gary R. Cc: Krummel, John R.; Ditmars, John D. Subject: Safety Items from Facility Inspection Gary, Thank you for assisting EVS management yesterday with the facility inspection of EVS space on the 5th & 6th floors of Building 240. During the inspection EVS employees were asked if they had any concerns or ideas relating to safety at Argonne. Several responses included traffic safety related topics summarized below: 1. Due in part to the ongoing construction activities around the site, roadways, including paved shoulders, are littered with gravel and debris. This presents a hazard for bicyclist, pedestrians and vehicles. Of particular note are the shoulders along West Gate Rd. west of Outer Circle. Here the shoulders are used extensively by bicyclists and pedestrians. 2. Directly related to construction activities at the ESB site, nearby roadways have been layered with dirt, mud, gravel, etc. In particular 94th St., Outer Circle (west) to West Gate and the site landfill area. 3. Lab-wide there is a general lack of compliance with traffic rules by drivers of vehicles. This includes, but not limited to, signal lights, stop signs, lane usage and speed limits. Please contact me if you have any questions. Bill

1 0

FW: Parking around 240
by Dyrkacz, Gary R. 14 Sep '11

14 Sep '11

Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333 From: Judy Stickels [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 10:19 AM To: Dyrkacz, Gary R. Subject: Fwd: Parking around 240 fyi -- Begin forwarded message: From: Judy Stickels <stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: September 13, 2011 12:49:00 PM CDT To: Edmund A. Holohan III <eholohan(a)alcf.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: Parking around 240 Hi Ed, I did verify that ESB contractors are not parking in our lots. It could be some of our contractors and, as you said, it could be B203 occupants. --Judy On Sep 12, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Edmund A. Holohan III wrote: Hi Judy: I hate to sound like I'm whining, but... :) Again today I arrived to find the west and south lots completely full, and also witnessed individuals walking from their cars in the south lot across the street in the direction of the ATLAS area. I realize that some biology staff move between buildings, but since the construction began, parking in the south lot has been completely wiped out. I've also seen a number of vehicles in the south lot that I would describe as being in "significant disrepair" and I frankly doubt are owned by employees working in building 240 - I'm under the impression that construction crew for the ESB should not be using our parking areas? Thanks, - Ed ------------------------------------------- -- Edmund A. Holohan III - ed(a)anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]> ----- -- HPC Network Administration Specialist -- -- Leadership Computing Facility ---------- -- Argonne National Laboratory ------------ -- http://www.alcf.anl.gov/ --------------- ------------------------------------------- Judy Stickels Manager, TCS Building Operations MCS/240, Rm. 3142 Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 630-252-3369 (voice) stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]> Judy Stickels Manager, TCS Building Operations MCS/240, Rm. 3142 Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 630-252-3369 (voice) stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>

1 0

Fwd: Another Safety Concern re Walkway to Cafeteria
by Jim Feigl 13 Sep '11

13 Sep '11

Begin forwarded message: > From: Judy Stickels <stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov> > Date: September 7, 2011 10:42:23 AM CDT > To: Jim Feigl <feigl(a)mcs.anl.gov> > Subject: Another Safety Concern re Walkway to Cafeteria > > how do you want me to handle these ... send to a distribution, just > to you, to you and hogan, keep gary in the loop? let me know. > thanks. > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: "Hollopeter, Patricia E." <PHollopeter(a)anl.gov> >> Date: September 7, 2011 8:49:42 AM CDT >> To: "Stickels, Judith K." <stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov> >> Subject: RE: Pick-up truck needs to be moved >> >> Judy: >> >> I’ve been meaning to contact you regarding walking to the cafeteria >> safely from Bldg. 240. Currently, it is not good. >> >> They made a nice sidewalk from our end, but once you’re off it, the >> pavement is very uneven and once you hit the barriers, it’s up for >> grabs as to where one should go. I strongly believe that they >> should construct a similar sidewalk from the barriers to the >> existing sidewalk. This could be especially dangerous in winter. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Pat >> > > Judy Stickels > Manager, TCS Building Operations > MCS/240, Rm. 3142 > Argonne National Laboratory > 9700 South Cass Avenue > Argonne, IL 60439 > 630-252-3369 (voice) > stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov >

1 0

FW: Safety suggestions - followup from Rick's safety meeting
by Dyrkacz, Gary R. 13 Sep '11

13 Sep '11

Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333 From: Lillian Ruscic [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 3:03 PM To: Wilde, Michael J. Cc: Stickels, Judith K.; Dyrkacz, Gary R. Subject: Re: Safety suggestions - followup from Rick's safety meeting Thank you Mike for your great ideas. I will get together with Judy to determine how to best address your suggestions. Lillian Ruscic ESH QA Coordinator for CELS, LCF & MCS B240 AES 2-4471 ________________________________ From: "Michael Wilde" <wilde(a)mcs.anl.gov> To: "Judy Stickels" <stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov>, "Lillian Ruscic" <lruscic(a)cels.anl.gov> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 12:42:28 PM Subject: Safety suggestions - followup from Rick's safety meeting Dear Judy and Lillian, As a followup to Rick's request to submit suggestions for enhancing workplace safety, I've collected the following ideas. Please note that this is in the spirit of the intense scrutiny that Rick requested; some of the observations below are perhaps overly cautious and do not necessarily merit actions, but I assume that these will of course be filtered out by the people scrutinizing the collected suggestions. Regards, - Mike Traffic safety -------------- Bikes: The roadway from Cass to the main entrance seems to me to be hazardous to bike riders, especially with increased construction traffic. I recently saw a bike rider almost forced off the shoulder by a truck that did not give the rider sufficient room. The problems are: - the edge of the roadway is in most places is in terrible condition - we should have larger warning sign(s) to motorists at the Cass entrance to watch for bikes - we should restripe the roadway - both centerline and shoulder stripes - the transition from roadway to gravel shoulder should be more bike-friendly - ideally we should create a narrow but clear bike lane at the shoulders - also more clear warning signs where the Waterfall Glen trails cross the roadway Deer: Leaving at dusk and early evening I often see deer on the side of the road; the red notice sign at the guardhouse could warn motorists to watch for deer more often, especially at the time and seasons when they are most frequently out. Cass exit: Making a left turn from the main roadway to northbound Cass (ie towards I55) at rush hour is often congested with Argonne traffic. Some warning signage on Cass about cars exiting might help reduce the temptation for Argonne drivers making fast left turns to squeeze out. Perhaps we can get whatever agency maintains that stretch of Cass (state, county?) to also re-stripe it, because its hard to visually gauge whether traffic coming up Cass from the south is in the left or right northbound lane, and hence hard to gauge when its safe to make a left. Its not clear that better striping would help; but maybe a state traffic engineer could assess the intersection? Building 240 ------------ The 240 entry walkway, as you walk out and down to the left: in winter, when the light is low or in the dark, its a bit hard to see the edge of the steps. Also on very icy days, the pitch of the walkway can make it quite slippery. Maybe assess this when winter comes around? More lighting, or salt/sand applied by 240 maint staff; maybe something to make the stairs less "invisible" like a subtle aesthetic paint stripe on the edge? (Something visible, but not the back-end-yellow warning stripe ;) On the 5th floor, there is a gray electrical raceway installed right across what on other floors is a walkway. As its the clearest walkway to the restrooms, conference rooms, and library, we all step over this ~18"-high raceway; someone is going to trip doing that some day, and its right by a railing, making it easy to drop something over the edge in the process. Plus its distracting to the person whose desk is right there. Can this panel either be truncated to make a true walking path there, or blocked off so people don't walk that way? Low prio: Maybe Im too paranoid here, but Im always worried about dropping something off the 5th floor catwalks. Especially something like a coffee cup slipping out of my hand, or breaking on the floor and the shards hurting someone below. Im surprised that the metalwork on the catwalk railings leaves such a large gap at the floor. Maybe rugs on the catwalks could reduce the risk of breaking or falling objects? Similarly: the large wood planks on the railing add a nice warm touch to the concrete of the interior; I assume that these are meant for people to chat at and set down their coffee cups on? But I've always been similarly surprised that these planks don't have any backstop on them, especially the ones on the higher floors. Aesthetically they are very nice; this is just my paranoid safety concern. Maybe a 2" backsplash out of matching wood? Other even-more paranoid observations: many 240 parking lot rows border grassy areas, where cars parking too close to high dry brush in hot weather might cause a fire. Add concrete bumper stops? (Probably way too paranoid to justify the cost; driver caution is probably all thats needed. Or: just have these areas mowed lower, and more often (despite the fact that aesthetically I welcome the natural tall-brush look). And: In the main stairway to the 5th floor (the one from the main entrance by the cafe) - there's a sizable gap from the edge of the concrete stairs to the wall, about 2". Seems like a woman's or child's shoe could get caught in there if they were, say, crowded to the edge of the stair to make room for someone or just walking with other people. Other buildings --------------- I often walk through building 203 on the way from 240 to 208 (especially on very hot days). Im always amazed at how many "cool" looking labs seem somewhat open to passers-by. I suspect a walk-through in 203 might yield a few rooms that should be more clearly secured or marked as "Do Not Enter". Lastly: others have commented on the list that the walking route from 240 to the cafeteria and 201 needs to be much more clearly marked, and I strongly agree. So again, thank you both for maintaining what I feel is an excellent and safe work environment; I only offer these perhaps overly-cautious observations in the spirit requested by Rick. Regards, - Mike -- Michael Wilde Computation Institute, University of Chicago Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Laboratory

1 0