March 2015 - discuss - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

(no subject)
by Chafik sanaa 07 Mar '15

07 Mar '15

when I execute my program nothing appears, it must use a parallelism even for reading our text file !? this is my code: #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include "mpi.h" #define MAX_LIGNE 40 #define MAX_COL 40 #define Matrice_adjacence "fichier22.txt" #define Matrice_General "fichier111.txt" typedef int Matrice[MAX_LIGNE][MAX_COL]; int main(int argc, char** argv) { int nbr_proc, rang_proc; Matrice E; int m1, n1; FILE * aLire = fopen(Matrice_General, "r"); if (aLire == NULL) { printf("No file"); } else { fscanf(aLire, "%d%d", &n1, &m1); for (int i = 0; i < n1; i++) { for (int j = 0; j < m1; j++) fscanf(aLire, "%d", &E[i][j]); fscanf(aLire, "\n"); } } fclose(aLire); MPI_Init(&argc, &argv); MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &rang_proc); MPI_Comm_size(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &nbr_proc); printf("Hi from proc %d ", rang_proc); MPI_Barrier(MPI_COMM_WORLD); MPI_Finalize(); } _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

1 0

Re: [mpich-discuss] MPE running problem
by Rob Latham 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

On 03/04/2015 09:24 PM, Mikhael C wrote: > That works! > I installed the MPICH2 1.5rc3 and now the MPE works nice. > If someone knows how to fix this problem and use mpe with MPICH3 > please help, but I believe that MPICH2 is enough for me. You might need to get the latest MPE from the git repository: http://git.mpich.org/mpe.git/ MPE is now in 'community support' mode, so if you try it out and find things you have to change, please send patches. ==rob > > Thanks Fatemeh, > > Mikhael Chrum > UTFPR - Toledo, Brasil > > > Hi, > > I have used the version of MPICH that comes with MPE. also, I found the > lecture from rice university useful. The one that installs it by an > script. > http://www.caam.rice.edu/~timwar/Concertina/caam520menu.html > > Hope you find it useful. > Fatemeh > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Mikhael C <mkchrum(a)gmail.com > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'm having some trouble trying to generate log files with MPE. > > > > I've installed MPICH with the following command: > > ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/mpich 2>&1 | tee c.txt > > > > And then the MPE: > > ./configure --with-mpich=--prefix=/usr/local/mpich \ > > --with-mpichdev=/usr/local/mpich/lib \ > > --prefix=/usr/local/mpich \ > > --with-mpicc=/usr/local/mpich/bin/mpicc \ > > --disable-f77 > > > > MPICH goes fine, but when i try to compile with mpecc i get this > message: > > > > $mpecc -mpilog -o monte_carlo_pi_2.o monte_carlo_pi_2.c > > /usr/bin/ld: library not found for -llmpe > > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > > > The equivalent expression gives the same error: > > $ mpicc -o monte_carlo_pi_2.o monte_carlo_pi_2.c > -L/usr/local/mpich/lib > > -llmpe -lmpe > > > > Can someone help me? > > > > Thank You, > > Mikhael Chrum > > UTFPR - Toledo, Brasil > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org <mailto:[email protected]> > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- Rob Latham Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Lab, IL USA _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

1 0

Re: [mpich-discuss] MPE running problem
by Mikhael C 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

That works! I installed the MPICH2 1.5rc3 and now the MPE works nice. If someone knows how to fix this problem and use mpe with MPICH3 please help, but I believe that MPICH2 is enough for me. Thanks Fatemeh, Mikhael Chrum UTFPR - Toledo, Brasil > Hi, > > I have used the version of MPICH that comes with MPE. also, I found the > lecture from rice university useful. The one that installs it by an script. > http://www.caam.rice.edu/~timwar/Concertina/caam520menu.html > > Hope you find it useful. > Fatemeh > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Mikhael C <mkchrum(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'm having some trouble trying to generate log files with MPE. > > > > I've installed MPICH with the following command: > > ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/mpich 2>&1 | tee c.txt > > > > And then the MPE: > > ./configure --with-mpich=--prefix=/usr/local/mpich \ > > --with-mpichdev=/usr/local/mpich/lib \ > > --prefix=/usr/local/mpich \ > > --with-mpicc=/usr/local/mpich/bin/mpicc \ > > --disable-f77 > > > > MPICH goes fine, but when i try to compile with mpecc i get this message: > > > > $mpecc -mpilog -o monte_carlo_pi_2.o monte_carlo_pi_2.c > > /usr/bin/ld: library not found for -llmpe > > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > > > The equivalent expression gives the same error: > > $ mpicc -o monte_carlo_pi_2.o monte_carlo_pi_2.c -L/usr/local/mpich/lib > > -llmpe -lmpe > > > > Can someone help me? > > > > Thank You, > > Mikhael Chrum > > UTFPR - Toledo, Brasil > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

1 0

Re: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Finalize hangs in dynamic connection in case of failed process
by Wesley Bland 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Roy, Hirak <Hirak_Roy(a)mentor.com> wrote: > Hi Wesley, > > > > As I mentioned in my email, MPI_disconnect hangs. > > Here is a short program which you can run. > > Please note that there is an “assert” in client.c > > Compile : > > >> mpicc server.c –o server > > >> mpicc client.c –o client > > > > To run use two shell/terminal : > > Term1>> mpiexec –n 1 ./server > > Term2>> mpiexec –n 1 ./client > > > > Please press any key on the server terminal. > > > > > > > > I earlier filed a bug related to this : > http://trac.mpich.org/projects/mpich/ticket/2205 > > My question : > > 1> What happens if we don’t call MPI_Finalize and call exit(0)? > Mostly nothing. In theory, some things might not get cleaned up, but probably the worst you'll see is a nasty error message. > 2> Is there anyway I can forcefully complete MPI_disconnect from > server side ? > I don't know of anything that will allow you to do that. > > > > > Thanks, > > Hirak > > > > > > Ps : The reason of using sock is : bug in nemesis : > http://trac.mpich.org/projects/mpich/ticket/1103 and > http://trac.mpich.org/projects/mpich/ticket/79 > > > > > > *Wesley Bland* wbland at anl.gov > <discuss%40mpich.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bmpich-discuss%5D%20MPI_Finalize%20hangs%20in%20dynamic%20connection%20in%0A%09case%20of%20failed%20process&In-Reply-To=%3CF4B1C63E-062B-4036-9DE5-A4C93096F32C%40anl.gov%3E> > *Thu Feb 26 10:13:42 CST 2015* > > - Previous message: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Finalize hangs in dynamic > connection in case of failed process > <http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-February/003725.html> > - Next message: [mpich-discuss] query ABI version > <http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-February/003726.html> > - *Messages sorted by:* [ date ] > <http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-February/date.html#3740> > [ thread ] > <http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-February/thread.html#3740> > [ subject ] > <http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-February/subject.html#3740> > [ author ] > <http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-February/author.html#3740> > > ------------------------------ > > First, I believe the sock device is untested with most of the MPICH fault tolerance features, so YMMV here. > > > > Is there a reason that you aren’t calling MPI_Disconnect for the failed process? Did you try it an something bad happened? That seems like the most straightforward way of doing things. > > > > Otherwise, this sounds like a known issue that we’re seeing from time to time with MPI_Finalize and the FT work. It’s something I’m trying to figure out now. If you can reduce your code down to the minimum and send it to me, I can use it as a test case to try to fix the problem. > > > > Thanks, > > Wesley > > > > >* On Feb 19, 2015, at 5:15 AM, Roy, Hirak <Hirak_Roy at mentor.com <https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>> wrote:* > > > > > >* Hi All,* > > > > > >* I am using MPICH with sock connection.* > > >* I also setup processes using dynamic connection method (MPI_Comm_connect/MPI_Comm_accept). It’s a master-slave architecture where master accepts the connections from slaves.* > > > > > >* Now if one of the process dies (or get killed), I can still recover from this (without using checkpoint/restore method).* > > >* For the particular process in master, I do not call MPI_disconnect (it hangs and does not complete).* > > >* As a result, my MPI_Finalize in master hangs and does not complete.* > > >* Do you have a workaround to forcefully complete MPI_Finalize or MPI_disconnect?* > > >* I tried MPI_Comm_free on the failed connection. However, it does not solve the hang in finalize.* > > > > > >* Thanks,* > > >* Hirak* > > >* _______________________________________________* > > > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

1 0

Re: [mpich-discuss] MPE running problem
by Fateme Hendijani 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hi, I have used the version of MPICH that comes with MPE. also, I found the lecture from rice university useful. The one that installs it by an script. http://www.caam.rice.edu/~timwar/Concertina/caam520menu.html Hope you find it useful. Fatemeh On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Mikhael C <mkchrum(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having some trouble trying to generate log files with MPE. > > I've installed MPICH with the following command: > ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/mpich 2>&1 | tee c.txt > > And then the MPE: > ./configure --with-mpich=--prefix=/usr/local/mpich \ > --with-mpichdev=/usr/local/mpich/lib \ > --prefix=/usr/local/mpich \ > --with-mpicc=/usr/local/mpich/bin/mpicc \ > --disable-f77 > > MPICH goes fine, but when i try to compile with mpecc i get this message: > > $mpecc -mpilog -o monte_carlo_pi_2.o monte_carlo_pi_2.c > /usr/bin/ld: library not found for -llmpe > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > The equivalent expression gives the same error: > $ mpicc -o monte_carlo_pi_2.o monte_carlo_pi_2.c -L/usr/local/mpich/lib > -llmpe -lmpe > > Can someone help me? > > Thank You, > Mikhael Chrum > UTFPR - Toledo, Brasil > > > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

1 0

Re: [mpich-discuss] calculated a execution time in a parallel programe
by Balaji, Pavan 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Please direct general parallel computing questions to stack overflow or other generic discussion Forums. This mailing list is for MPICH related questions. Regards, -- Pavan > On Mar 4, 2015, at 7:45 AM, Chafik sanaa <san.chafik(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > so I can not base my article on the execution time calculation in my own machine because I did not have a parallel machine? > > 2015-03-04 0:43 GMT+01:00 Junchao Zhang <jczhang(a)mcs.anl.gov>: > Yes. I believe your i5 machine has least two cores. So it is indeed a parallel machine. You should observe some speedup when you run program with two MPI processes. > > --Junchao Zhang > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Chafik sanaa <san.chafik(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I use the MPICH2 to parallelize my algorithm on an i5 machine, is the time calculated in this type of machinery is the time actually consumed or estimated in my programe? I ask this question because someone told me that if you do not work on a parallel machine then even if you calculate the execution time in your parallel algorithm and you compare it with the algorithm that you do not use parallelism is not correct.effectively I tried to compare the execution time of both programs but really I find that there's a accelerartion when I use the parallelism > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Pavan Balaji ✉️ http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

1 0

Re: [mpich-discuss] calculated a execution time in a parallel programe
by Chafik sanaa 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

so I can not base my article on the execution time calculation in my own machine because I did not have a parallel machine? 2015-03-04 0:43 GMT+01:00 Junchao Zhang <jczhang(a)mcs.anl.gov>: > Yes. I believe your i5 machine has least two cores. So it is indeed a > parallel machine. You should observe some speedup when you run program with > two MPI processes. > > --Junchao Zhang > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Chafik sanaa <san.chafik(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> I use the MPICH2 to parallelize my algorithm on an i5 machine, is the >> time calculated in this type of machinery is the time actually consumed or >> estimated in my programe? I ask this question because someone told me that >> if you do not work on a parallel machine then even if you calculate the >> execution time in your parallel algorithm and you compare it with the >> algorithm that you do not use parallelism is not correct.effectively I >> tried to compare the execution time of both programs but really I find that >> there's a accelerartion when I use the parallelism >> >> _______________________________________________ >> discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org >> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: >> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> > > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

1 0

Re: [mpich-discuss] calculated a execution time in a parallel programe
by Junchao Zhang 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

Yes. I believe your i5 machine has least two cores. So it is indeed a parallel machine. You should observe some speedup when you run program with two MPI processes. --Junchao Zhang On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Chafik sanaa <san.chafik(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I use the MPICH2 to parallelize my algorithm on an i5 machine, is the time > calculated in this type of machinery is the time actually consumed or > estimated in my programe? I ask this question because someone told me that > if you do not work on a parallel machine then even if you calculate the > execution time in your parallel algorithm and you compare it with the > algorithm that you do not use parallelism is not correct.effectively I > tried to compare the execution time of both programs but really I find that > there's a accelerartion when I use the parallelism > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

1 0

Re: [mpich-discuss] MPICH V3.0.4 - Unable to compile simple code
by Junchao Zhang 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

I did not find anything wrong in the log file. The configure script detected the alignment of a Fortran common block with one integer is 16, as shown below 11968 configure:52396: gfortran -o conftest -O2 conftest.f90 pac_conftest.o -lrt -lpthread > pac_align1.log 2>&1 11969 configure:52396: $? = 0 11970 configure:52403: diff -b pac_align0.log pac_align1.log > pac_test.log 11971 configure:52406: $? = 0 11972 configure:52495: result: 16 The odd numbers in the warning message "_Cmpifcmb3, _Cmpifcmb5, _Cmpifcmb7, _Cmpifcmb9" seem to suggest the actual alignment is affected by neighbor blocks, which I am not sure. Could you try the new mpich-3.1.4 at http://www.mpich.org/downloads/? If the problem still exists, I can create a ticket. BTW, if you do not need Fortran, you can configure with --enable-fortran=none --Junchao Zhang On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Kush Patel <kushpatel000(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I've attached the config.log file. Thanks for your help so far, Jeff. > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Jeff Hammond <jeff.science(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> For example, it helps to know what compiler you are using. >> >> Since MPICH contains absolutely no C++ outside of the now-deleted C++ >> bindings, that doesn't matter. I can only assume you are using the >> MPI C bindings. >> >> In the rare instance of Linux-related issues, the result of "uname -a" >> contains the important info. I've never seen an MPICH bug that was >> specific to the Linux distro... >> >> Just attach your config.log and that will provide the information people >> need. >> >> Jeff >> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Kush Patel <kushpatel000(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > I'm not sure exactly what information you need, but here is what I know. >> > >> > Environment: Debian >> > MPICH version: 3.0.4 >> > Language: C++ >> > >> > In regards to that link, is the process just replacing the indicated >> source >> > files and reinstalling MPICH? Also it seems that issue was for >> Fortran90, >> > would the same procedure described work for C++? >> > >> > Thank you. >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Jeff Hammond <jeff.science(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> You're going to need to provide more information for someone to help >> you. >> >> >> >> I see this issue has been encountered in the past with PGI: >> >> http://trac.mpich.org/projects/mpich/ticket/1073. >> >> >> >> Jeff >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Kush Patel <kushpatel000(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> >> > >> >> > I'm having trouble getting a simple "Hello World" code to compile. >> The >> >> > following errors occur when I try to call MPI_INIT. >> >> > >> >> > /usr/bin/ld: Warning: alignment 16 of symbol `_Cmpifcmb3' in >> >> > /usr/local/lib/libmpich.a(setbot.o) is smaller than 32 in >> >> > /usr/local/lib/libmpich.a(setbotf.o) >> >> > /usr/bin/ld: Warning: alignment 16 of symbol `_Cmpifcmb5' in >> >> > /usr/local/lib/libmpich.a(setbot.o) is smaller than 32 in >> >> > /usr/local/lib/libmpich.a(setbotf.o) >> >> > /usr/bin/ld: Warning: alignment 16 of symbol `_Cmpifcmb7' in >> >> > /usr/local/lib/libmpich.a(setbot.o) is smaller than 32 in >> >> > /usr/local/lib/libmpich.a(setbotf.o) >> >> > /usr/bin/ld: Warning: alignment 16 of symbol `_Cmpifcmb9' in >> >> > /usr/local/lib/libmpich.a(setbot.o) is smaller than 32 in >> >> > /usr/local/lib/libmpich.a(setbotf.o) >> >> > >> >> > I have been unable to find a solution to this. >> >> > >> >> > Thank you, >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Kush Patel >> >> > University of Houston >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org >> >> > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: >> >> > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jeff Hammond >> >> jeff.science(a)gmail.com >> >> http://jeffhammond.github.io/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org >> >> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: >> >> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Kush Patel >> > Doctoral Student - Bittner Group >> > University of Houston >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org >> > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: >> > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> >> >> >> -- >> Jeff Hammond >> jeff.science(a)gmail.com >> http://jeffhammond.github.io/ >> _______________________________________________ >> discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org >> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: >> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> > > > > -- > Kush Patel > Doctoral Student - Bittner Group > University of Houston > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

1 0

Re: [mpich-discuss] MPICH V3.0.4 - Unable to compile simple code
by Kush Patel 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

I've attached the config.log file. Thanks for your help so far, Jeff. On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Jeff Hammond <jeff.science(a)gmail.com> wrote: > For example, it helps to know what compiler you are using. > > Since MPICH contains absolutely no C++ outside of the now-deleted C++ > bindings, that doesn't matter. I can only assume you are using the > MPI C bindings. > > In the rare instance of Linux-related issues, the result of "uname -a" > contains the important info. I've never seen an MPICH bug that was > specific to the Linux distro... > > Just attach your config.log and that will provide the information people > need. > > Jeff > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Kush Patel <kushpatel000(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure exactly what information you need, but here is what I know. > > > > Environment: Debian > > MPICH version: 3.0.4 > > Language: C++ > > > > In regards to that link, is the process just replacing the indicated > source > > files and reinstalling MPICH? Also it seems that issue was for Fortran90, > > would the same procedure described work for C++? > > > > Thank you. > > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Jeff Hammond <jeff.science(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> You're going to need to provide more information for someone to help > you. > >> > >> I see this issue has been encountered in the past with PGI: > >> http://trac.mpich.org/projects/mpich/ticket/1073. > >> > >> Jeff > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Kush Patel <kushpatel000(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > I'm having trouble getting a simple "Hello World" code to compile. The > >> > following errors occur when I try to call MPI_INIT. > >> > > >> > /usr/bin/ld: Warning: alignment 16 of symbol `_Cmpifcmb3' in > >> > /usr/local/lib/libmpich.a(setbot.o) is smaller than 32 in > >> > /usr/local/lib/libmpich.a(setbotf.o) > >> > /usr/bin/ld: Warning: alignment 16 of symbol `_Cmpifcmb5' in > >> > /usr/local/lib/libmpich.a(setbot.o) is smaller than 32 in > >> > /usr/local/lib/libmpich.a(setbotf.o) > >> > /usr/bin/ld: Warning: alignment 16 of symbol `_Cmpifcmb7' in > >> > /usr/local/lib/libmpich.a(setbot.o) is smaller than 32 in > >> > /usr/local/lib/libmpich.a(setbotf.o) > >> > /usr/bin/ld: Warning: alignment 16 of symbol `_Cmpifcmb9' in > >> > /usr/local/lib/libmpich.a(setbot.o) is smaller than 32 in > >> > /usr/local/lib/libmpich.a(setbotf.o) > >> > > >> > I have been unable to find a solution to this. > >> > > >> > Thank you, > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Kush Patel > >> > University of Houston > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org > >> > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: > >> > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Jeff Hammond > >> jeff.science(a)gmail.com > >> http://jeffhammond.github.io/ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org > >> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: > >> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Kush Patel > > Doctoral Student - Bittner Group > > University of Houston > > > > _______________________________________________ > > discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > -- > Jeff Hammond > jeff.science(a)gmail.com > http://jeffhammond.github.io/ > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- Kush Patel Doctoral Student - Bittner Group University of Houston _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org To manage subscription options or unsubscribe: https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

1 0