On 12/24/2012 03:16 AM US Central Time, behzad moradi wrote:
> yes,I do running MPICH with simpler program.
> no,It doesn't work correctly.
Doesn't work how? Can you give some more details?
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
Unsubscribe
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Pavan Balaji <balaji(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> There should not be any difference in which MPI is used for any
> high-level library. Did you try running MPICH with simpler programs?
> Does that work correctly?
>
> -- Pavan
>
> On 08/30/2012 02:41 AM US Central Time, Angel de Vicente wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> last days I have been trying Paramesh
>> (http://www.physics.drexel.edu/~olson/paramesh-doc/Users_manual/amr.html) I'm
>> using version 4.1, and I managed to make it work with one of the newest
>> Intel compilers and OpenMPI, but with the latest MPICH2 version, the
>> code works OK only if I run it in one processor, giving bogus results or
>> aborting whenever I try to run it with more processors.
>>
>> By any chance, anyone here has any experience with Paramesh+MPICH2?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpich-discuss mailing list mpich-discuss(a)mcs.anl.gov
>> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/mpich-discuss
>>
>
> --
> Pavan Balaji
> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
yes,I do running MPICH with simpler program.
no,It doesn't work correctly.
On Dec 24, 2012, at 5:11 AM, Pavan Balaji wrote:
>
> There should not be any difference in which MPI is used for any
> high-level library. Did you try running MPICH with simpler programs?
> Does that work correctly?
>
> -- Pavan
>
> On 08/30/2012 02:41 AM US Central Time, Angel de Vicente wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> last days I have been trying Paramesh
>> (http://www.physics.drexel.edu/~olson/paramesh-doc/Users_manual/amr.html) I'm
>> using version 4.1, and I managed to make it work with one of the newest
>> Intel compilers and OpenMPI, but with the latest MPICH2 version, the
>> code works OK only if I run it in one processor, giving bogus results or
>> aborting whenever I try to run it with more processors.
>>
>> By any chance, anyone here has any experience with Paramesh+MPICH2?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpich-discuss mailing list mpich-discuss(a)mcs.anl.gov
>> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/mpich-discuss
>>
>
> --
> Pavan Balaji
> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
I'm cc'ing our Windows expert, Jayesh. He might know what's going on.
-- Pavan
On 12/05/2012 03:27 PM US Central Time, Ayesha Ghani wrote:
> Hi Dave
>
>
> Thanks for your help! I have tried to install a few versions of MPICH2
> on cygwin now.
>
> For version 2-1.4, the c.txt file seems fine (no errors) but the m.txt
> file goes on for a while 'Entering directory' and 'Leaving directory'
> and then at the end outputs an error.
>
> make[1]: *** No rule to make target
> '/home/agha023/libraries/mpich2-1.4/src/mpl/Makefile.am' needed by
> '/home/agha023/libraries/mpich2-1.4/src/mpl/Makefile.in'. Stop
> make: *** [all-redirect] Error 1
>
>
> From searching up forums this error occurs because make couldnt find
> instructions in the Makefile.in to build the target. However Makefile.am
> and Makefile.in both exist in the directory above.
>
> Again however I can't find a solution to this problem and would greatly
> appreciate any help.
>
> Should I email the m.txt and c.txt files?
>
>
> Kind Regards
> Ayesha Ghani
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 6 December 2012 08:03, Dave Goodell <goodell(a)mcs.anl.gov
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Try using mpich2-1.4 instead. It would not be surprising if there
> was a problem with 1.5 on cygwin.
>
> -Dave
>
> On Dec 4, 2012, at 8:48 PM PST, Ayesha Ghani wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> >
> > I was working through the installation instructions for mpich2
> very carefully this time and my .c file has an error at the end:
> > 'immediate ERROR: nemesis does not exist'
> >
> > I would appreciate any assistance.
> >
> >
> > Kind Regards
> > Ayesha
> > <c.txt>_______________________________________________
> > discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org <mailto:[email protected]>
> > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org <mailto:[email protected]>
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
The problem seems to be that the proxy is created, but it is providing
an ID which is outside the expected range. The likely problem here is
that you are running this on a combination of 32-bit and 64-bit
machines, in which case mpiexec would get very confused. Is this the case?
-- Pavan
On 11/15/2012 08:12 AM US Central Time, Will Dixon wrote:
> I am making a cluster for Francis Marion University and can't figure out
> how to get rid of this error. I understand what it is stating. A proxy
> is created but it can't find it once created. I think it isn't creating
> a proxy. The other errors seem to roll off errors from the proxy error.
> I tried looking up PMI but could find anything relative.
> I get this error every time I try to use mpirun -np 6 ./hello I have 6
> ibook g3's that have powerpc processors and a headnode that is a tower
> that runs intel. I installed mpich2 on the headnode and on one of the
> slaves. I copied the slave's mpich to the others. I am able to ssh
> without any password to the slaves using rsa. my HYDRA_HOST_FILE
> environment variable is /mpich2/hosts
>
> [mpiexec@headnode] HYD_pmcd_pmiserv_proxy_init_cb
> (./pm/pmiserv/pmiserv_cb.c:529): cannot find proxy with ID 33554432
> [mpiexec@headnode] HYDT_dmxu_poll_wait_for_event
> (./tools/demux/demux_poll.c:77): callback returned error status
> [mpiexec@headnode] HYD_pmci_wait_for_completion
> (./pm/pmiserv/pmiserv_pmci.c:196): error waiting for event
> [mpiexec@headnode] main (./ui/mpich/mpiexec.c:325): process manager
> error waiting for completion
>
> I am able using c3 to run cexecs 'date' and they all return a date no
> problem. my /mpich2/hosts looks like:
>
> node01
> node02
> node03
> node04
> node05
> node07
>
> The headnode has two Ethernet ports one going to the internet and the
> other to a switch with the slaves connected to them. They are all
> running Debian Linux 6.0.6.
> Help would be much appreciated.
> Sincerely,
> Will Dixon
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list discuss(a)mpich.org
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
MPE is not fully supported at this time. Did you try using a different
performance monitoring tool, such as Tau or HPCToolkit?
-- Pavan
On 11/12/2012 03:37 AM US Central Time, Edward Smith wrote:
>
> Thank you for the reply.
>
> The same MPMD program works correctly without MPE.
> Each of the programs (a.exe and b.exe) also work indivdually using MPE.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpich-discuss mailing list mpich-discuss(a)mcs.anl.gov
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/mpich-discuss
>
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
Thanks John. I can reproduce this error. I've created a ticket for
this issue.
http://trac.mpich.org/projects/mpich/ticket/1773
-- Pavan
On 11/08/2012 02:13 PM US Central Time, John Fettig wrote:
> When I run
>
> mpiexec -configfile myConfigFile
>
> the input taken from the lines of myConfigFile is truncated at 1024
> characters. If the executable doesn't appear in the first 1024
> characters, mpiexec will complain that you didn't specify an
> executable. I see this because I set -env LD_LIBRARY_PATH which in my
> case is quite large.
>
> Here is the output of mpiexec -info
>
> $ mpiexec -info
> HYDRA build details:
> Version: 1.5
> Release Date: Mon Oct 8 14:00:48 CDT 2012
> CC: icc -L/usr/lib64 -lscif
> CXX: icpc -L/usr/lib64 -lscif
> F77: ifort -L/usr/lib64 -lscif
> F90: ifort -L/usr/lib64 -lscif
> Configure options: '--disable-option-checking'
> '--prefix=/home/jfe/local' '--disable-romio' '--disable-mpe' 'CC=icc'
> 'CXX=icpc' 'F77=ifort' 'FC=ifort' 'LIBS=-lpthread -lscif '
> 'LDFLAGS=-L/usr/lib64 ' '--with-device=ch3:nemesis:scif,tcp'
> '--cache-file=/dev/null' '--srcdir=.' 'CFLAGS= -O2' 'CPPFLAGS=
> -I/home/jfe/Downloads/mpich2-1.5/src/mpl/include
> -I/home/jfe/Downloads/mpich2-1.5/src/mpl/include
> -I/home/jfe/Downloads/mpich2-1.5/src/openpa/src
> -I/home/jfe/Downloads/mpich2-1.5/src/openpa/src'
> Process Manager: pmi
> Launchers available: ssh rsh fork slurm ll lsf
> sge manual persist
> Topology libraries available: hwloc
> Resource management kernels available: user slurm ll lsf sge pbs
> Checkpointing libraries available:
> Demux engines available: poll select
>
>
> Regards,
> John
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpich-discuss mailing list mpich-discuss(a)mcs.anl.gov
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/mpich-discuss
>
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
Rohit,
Can you try the latest mpich version (3.0.1)? There are some fixes in
there that might be related to this.
-- Pavan
On 11/06/2012 04:34 PM US Central Time, Jain, Rohit wrote:
> Thanks John. That does give me list of available binding option.
>
>
>
> It seems all binding options don�t work fine.
>
>
>
> All l1/l2/l3cache errors out:
>
> mpiexec -bind-to l3cache -n 1 mytest 200000 -1 : -n 4 mytest 200000 -1
>
> [proxy:0:0@gretel] cache_to_cpu_type
> (/u/prod/mpich/src/mpich2-1.5/src/pm/hydra/tools/topo/hwloc/topo_hwloc.c:258):
> cache level 3 not found
>
> [proxy:0:0@gretel] obj_type_to_map_str
> (/u/prod/mpich/src/mpich2-1.5/src/pm/hydra/tools/topo/hwloc/topo_hwloc.c:313):
> error while mapping cache to cpu object
>
> [mpiexec@gretel] control_cb
> (/u/prod/mpich/src/mpich2-1.5/src/pm/hydra/pm/pmiserv/pmiserv_cb.c:201):
> assert (!closed) failed
>
> [mpiexec@gretel] HYDT_dmxu_poll_wait_for_event
> (/u/prod/mpich/src/mpich2-1.5/src/pm/hydra/tools/demux/demux_poll.c:77):
> callback returned error status
>
> [mpiexec@gretel] HYD_pmci_wait_for_completion
> (/u/prod/mpich/src/mpich2-1.5/src/pm/hydra/pm/pmiserv/pmiserv_pmci.c:196):
> error waiting for event
>
> [mpiexec@gretel] main
> (/u/prod/mpich/src/mpich2-1.5/src/pm/hydra/ui/mpich/mpiexec.c:325):
> process manager error waiting for completion
>
>
>
>
>
> This hangs and doesn�t even exit after �ctrl-c�:
>
> mpiexec -bind-to numa -n 1 mytest 200000 -1 : -n 4 mytest 200000 -1
>
> [mpiexec@gretel] Sending Ctrl-C to processes as requested
>
> [mpiexec@gretel] Press Ctrl-C again to force abort
>
> Ctrl-C caught... cleaning up processes
>
> Ctrl-C caught... cleaning up processes
>
> Ctrl-C caught... cleaning up processes
>
> Ctrl-C caught... cleaning up processes
>
>
>
> Here is machine detail I am running it on:
>
> Processor name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5550 @
> 2.67GHz
>
> Speed (MHz) : 2660.125
>
> Cache size per processor : 8192 KB
>
> Number of processors : 2
>
> Number of cores per processor : 4
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Rohit
>
>
>
> *From:*[email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *John Fettig
> *Sent:* Monday, November 05, 2012 6:05 PM
> *To:* mpich-discuss
> *Subject:* Re: [mpich-discuss] cpu binding with 1.5 hydra
>
>
>
> Rohit,
>
> Did you try
>
> $ mpirun -bind-to -help
>
> This dumps all of the options for -bind-to.
>
> John
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Jain, Rohit <Rohit_Jain(a)mentor.com
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Hi Pavan,
>
> Could you please respond to it?
>
> Regards,
> Rohit
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpich-discuss-bounces(a)mcs.anl.gov
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> [mailto:[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Jain, Rohit
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 4:02 PM
> To: Pavan Balaji; mpich-discuss(a)mcs.anl.gov
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] cpu binding with 1.5 hydra
>
> Hi Pavan,
>
> Where do I find exact names of new binding options arguments?
>
> Like 'sockets' doesn't work, but 'socket' do. This page is not updated
> with correct options:
> http://wiki.mcs.anl.gov/mpich2/index.php/Using_the_Hydra_Process_Manager#Pr…
>
> Regards,
> Rohit
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pavan Balaji [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 8:36 AM
> To: mpich-discuss(a)mcs.anl.gov <mailto:[email protected]>
> Cc: Jain, Rohit
> Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] cpu binding with 1.5 hydra
>
>
> On 10/29/2012 07:13 PM, Jain, Rohit wrote:
>> Do you mean '-binding' option is also being deprecated? Is it replaced
> with '-bind-to'?
>
> It's being replaced with the -bind-to option. We might support -binding
> as an alias to -bind-to for quite some time, but we'd suggest users move
> to the new richer -bind-to interface.
>
> -- Pvaan
>
> --
> Pavan Balaji
> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
> _______________________________________________
> mpich-discuss mailing list mpich-discuss(a)mcs.anl.gov
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/mpich-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> mpich-discuss mailing list mpich-discuss(a)mcs.anl.gov
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/mpich-discuss
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpich-discuss mailing list mpich-discuss(a)mcs.anl.gov
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/mpich-discuss
>
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
Not for the proxy. Such functionality to specify a different directory
is only available for the MPI application executables. Sorry.
-- Pavan
On 10/31/2012 11:59 AM US Central Time, Azamat Mametjanov wrote:
> Is it possible to specify a different path to hydra_pmi_proxy on the
> remote node? My mpich paths on the local and remote nodes are not the
> same and I hope there is something like '--prefix
> <path_to_remote_mpich_install>. Thanks.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpich-discuss mailing list mpich-discuss(a)mcs.anl.gov
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/mpich-discuss
>
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
This looks like a problem with Maple Grid Computing. Please contact
them for instructions.
-- Pavan
On 10/05/2012 03:23 PM US Central Time, �tila Gracco wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm trying to install a program, Maple Grid Computing 16 , that requires
> that i install the mpich2 library, after i do that and go to the program
> instalation screen, at some point during instalation it asks me to put
> the Name of MPI shared lib, and the root location of it, i'm using
> Ubuntu 12.04 - 64 bits. I almost forgot to say, i'm kind of newbie in linux.
>
> --
> Att,
> *�tila Gracco*
> Acad�mico do 8� per�odo | Engenharia de Computa��o UFG
> +55 (62) 8126-1016
> Skype: atilagracco
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpich-discuss mailing list mpich-discuss(a)mcs.anl.gov
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/mpich-discuss
>
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
