April 2011 - Mg-rast - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [mg-rast] Unable to upload data
by Mark D'Souza 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

Hi, I will take a look into this and get back to you. -- Regards, Mark D'Souza -- for the MG-RAST team mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov http://metagenomics.anl.gov/ If you need to respond to this email please address it to the mailing-list mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov ----- Original Message ----- > From: amarots(a)iqsc.usp.br > To: "Jared Wilkening" <jared.wilkening(a)gmail.com> > Cc: mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov > Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 2:47:39 PM > Subject: [mg-rast] Unable to upload data > Dear MG-Rast developing team, > I've been trying to upload data for hours and can't get it done. The > "upload" link isn't performing as presented at the tutorial. In fact I > can't even post the files to be loaded. Instead the following message > is > showing up: [please wait for your upload to complete before viewing > other > tabs]. Although, I have no upload in progress. > What should I do to upload the data? > Thanks, > Amaro > > > > > > > > > > Amaro, > > > > We are about ready to finalized the last round of recomputes so I > > would > > expect they would be done by the end week or at latest early next > > week. > > New > > jobs are generally taking about a week at the moment due to our > > heavy load > > and the recomputing. > > > > Cheers, > > Jared Wilkening > > - for the MG-RAST development team > > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:53 PM, <amarots(a)iqsc.usp.br> wrote: > > > >> Dear MG-Rast developing team, > >> > >> I wonder if you have an estimated time for releasing the > >> metagenomes > >> which > >> are still recomputing at the new MG-RAST version 3? I'm > >> particularly > >> interested in the two metagenomes I'm signed as a user: 4453373.3 - > >> Amaro_RL1 and 4453374.3 - Amaro_RL2. > >> Also, I would like to know how long will it take to process new > >> data, > >> which is about to be loaded into the MG-RAST? > >> > >> I thank you in advance for the attention, > >> Best regards, > >> Amaro Trindade-Silva > >> > >> > >> > >> > >

1 0

Unable to upload data
by amarots＠iqsc.usp.br 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

Dear MG-Rast developing team, I've been trying to upload data for hours and can't get it done. The "upload" link isn't performing as presented at the tutorial. In fact I can't even post the files to be loaded. Instead the following message is showing up: [please wait for your upload to complete before viewing other tabs]. Although, I have no upload in progress. What should I do to upload the data? Thanks, Amaro > Amaro, > > We are about ready to finalized the last round of recomputes so I would > expect they would be done by the end week or at latest early next week. > New > jobs are generally taking about a week at the moment due to our heavy load > and the recomputing. > > Cheers, > Jared Wilkening > - for the MG-RAST development team > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:53 PM, <amarots(a)iqsc.usp.br> wrote: > >> Dear MG-Rast developing team, >> >> I wonder if you have an estimated time for releasing the metagenomes >> which >> are still recomputing at the new MG-RAST version 3? I'm particularly >> interested in the two metagenomes I'm signed as a user: 4453373.3 - >> Amaro_RL1 and 4453374.3 - Amaro_RL2. >> Also, I would like to know how long will it take to process new data, >> which is about to be loaded into the MG-RAST? >> >> I thank you in advance for the attention, >> Best regards, >> Amaro Trindade-Silva >> >> >> >> >

1 0

Fwd: dataset not moving?
by Mark D'Souza 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

----- Forwarded Message ----- > From: "Scot E Dowd PhD" <sdowd(a)pathogenresearch.org> > To: "Mark D'Souza" <dsouza(a)mcs.anl.gov> > Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 1:57:40 PM > Subject: RE: [mg-rast] dataset not moving? > cool got it ;-) > > Scot E Dowd PhD > Director > Research and Testing Laboratory > > > 4321 Marsha Sharp Fwy > Lubbock, TX 79407 > 806-789-6879 > sdowd(a)pathogenresearch.org > Confidentiality. > This electronic transmission is strictly confidential to the sender > and intended solely for the addressee. It may contain information > which is covered by legal, professional or other privilege. If you are > not the intended addressee, or someone authorized by the intended > addressee to receive transmissions on behalf of the addressee, you > must not retain, disclose in any form, copy or take any action in > reliance on this transmission. If you have received this transmission > in error, please notify the sender as soon as possible and destroy > this message. Research and Testing Laboratory reserves the right to > amend statements made herein in the event of a mistake. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark D'Souza [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 12:39 PM > To: Scot E Dowd PhD > Cc: mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov > Subject: Re: [mg-rast] dataset not moving? > > Hi, > > The problem is the fasta files end in a ^Z end-of-file character which > is being misinterpreted by the system. The simplest fix for now would > be to remove this character and resubmit the files -- open with a > plain simple text editor, go to the end of the file, delete everything > after the last sequence character even if nothing is visible, you may > lose a line break which you can add back in, then save, that should > take care of it. > > -- > Regards, > Mark D'Souza > -- for the MG-RAST team > > mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov > http://metagenomics.anl.gov/ > > If you need to respond to this email please address it to the > mailing-list mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Scot E Dowd PhD" <sdowd(a)pathogenresearch.org> > > To: mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov > > Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 11:01:52 AM > > Subject: [mg-rast] dataset not moving? > > Hiya Guys, > > > > Submitted a few datasets yesterday. Not sure if there is a problem > > but > > the page indicated 10 minutes to process but it is about 18hrs later > > and still same stage. I have refreshed the page as of this morning > > and > > I am using Firefox ;-) > > > > username is scotedowd > > > > > > > > Scot E Dowd PhD > > > > Director > > > > Research and Testing Laboratory > > > > > > > > > > > > 4321 Marsha Sharp Fwy > > > > Lubbock, TX 79407 > > > > 806-789-6879 > > > > sdowd(a)pathogenresearch.org > > > > Confidentiality. > > > > This electronic transmission is strictly confidential to the sender > > and intended solely for the addressee. It may contain information > > which is covered by legal, professional or other privilege. If you > > are > > not the intended addressee, or someone authorized by the intended > > addressee to receive transmissions on behalf of the addressee, you > > must not retain, disclose in any form, copy or take any action in > > reliance on this transmission. If you have received this > > transmission > > in error, please notify the sender as soon as possible and destroy > > this message. Research and Testing Laboratory reserves the right to > > amend statements made herein in the event of a mistake.

1 0

Re: [mg-rast] uploading 110 metagenomes at once?
by Mark D'Souza 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

Hi, What is the size of the data sets? Uploading as a a single zipped file should be fine, though smaller batches may be easier. -- Regards, Mark D'Souza -- for the MG-RAST team mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov http://metagenomics.anl.gov/ If you need to respond to this email please address it to the mailing-list mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tanya Yatsunenko" <yata(a)go.wustl.edu> > To: "MG- Rast" <mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov> > Cc: "Folker Meyer" <folker.meyer(a)googlemail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 1:37:01 PM > Subject: [mg-rast] uploading 110 metagenomes at once? > Hi again, and sorry to bug you so much. > I'm in a need to annotate 110 metagenomes (soon). Can I zip them in 1 > file and upload once, instead of uploading 1 at a time? And will mg > rast be able to handle so many at once? > thank yoU! > > > Tanya. > > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Andreas Wilke < wilke(a)mcs.anl.gov > > wrote: > > > > Hi Tanya , > > unfortunately we had to change the location of a logfile for our > database. This required a restart of the database. This does not > require a re-annotation of your metagenomes. > > > Please let us know if you have still problems to access your > metagenomes. > > > Regards, > > > Andreas Wilke > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:42 AM, Tanya Yatsunenko wrote: > > > Hi > > > I've used MG RAST long time ago, and still have several metagenomes > uploaded. However, when I tried to open "DAta Analysis" tab, I got > this message: Can't locate auto/DBI/ error.al in @INC (@INC contains: > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/FigKernelPackages > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/WebApplication > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/FortyEight > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/PPO > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/RAST > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/MGRAST > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/SeedViewer > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/ModelSEED > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/dev/common/lib > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/dev/common/lib/FigKernelPackages > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/config > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/test/FIGDisk/dist/releases/current/common/lib > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/test/FIGDisk/dist/releases/current/common/lib/FigKernelPackages > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/test/FIGDisk/dist/releases/current/common/lib/WebApplication > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/test/FIGDisk/dist/releases/current/common/lib/FortyEight > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/test/FIGDisk/dist/releases/current/common/lib/PPO > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/test/FIGDisk/config > /soft/packages/perl/5.12.1/lib/site_perl/5.12.1/x86_64-linux-thread-multi > /soft/packages/perl/5.12.1/lib/site_perl/5.12.1 > /soft/packages/perl/5.12.1/lib/5.12.1/x86_64-linux-thread-multi > /soft/packages/perl/5.12.1/lib/5.12.1 .) at > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/Babel/lib/Babel.pm > line 29 > > > Does that mean that I have to re-annotate all my metagenomes, i.e. > submit them as new jobs? > Thank you > > Tanya. > > > > > Andreas Wilke > Argonne National Laboratory > Mathematics and Computer Science Division > Bldg. 240 , 4F8 > 9700 South Cass Avenue > Argonne, IL 60439 > (630) 252-3190 (phone) > > (630) 252-5986 .(fax)

1 0

uploading 110 metagenomes at once?
by Tanya Yatsunenko 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

Hi again, and sorry to bug you so much. I'm in a need to annotate 110 metagenomes (soon). Can I zip them in 1 file and upload once, instead of uploading 1 at a time? And will mg rast be able to handle so many at once? thank yoU! Tanya. On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Andreas Wilke <wilke(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > Hi Tanya , > > unfortunately we had to change the location of a logfile for our database. > This required a restart of the database. This does not require a > re-annotation of your metagenomes. > > Please let us know if you have still problems to access your metagenomes. > > Regards, > > Andreas Wilke > > > > On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:42 AM, Tanya Yatsunenko wrote: > > Hi > > I've used MG RAST long time ago, and still have several metagenomes > uploaded. However, when I tried to open "DAta Analysis" tab, I got this > message:Can't locate auto/DBI/error.al in @INC (@INC contains: > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/FigKernelPackages > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/WebApplication > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/FortyEight > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/PPO > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/RAST > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/MGRAST > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/SeedViewer > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/ModelSEED > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/dev/common/lib > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/dev/common/lib/FigKernelPackages > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/config > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/test/FIGDisk/dist/releases/current/common/lib > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/test/FIGDisk/dist/releases/current/common/lib/FigKernelPackages > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/test/FIGDisk/dist/releases/current/common/lib/WebApplication > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/test/FIGDisk/dist/releases/current/common/lib/FortyEight > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/test/FIGDisk/dist/releases/current/common/lib/PPO > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/test/FIGDisk/config > /soft/packages/perl/5.12.1/lib/site_perl/5.12.1/x86_64-linux-thread-multi > /soft/packages/perl/5.12.1/lib/site_perl/5.12.1 > /soft/packages/perl/5.12.1/lib/5.12.1/x86_64-linux-thread-multi > /soft/packages/perl/5.12.1/lib/5.12.1 .) at > /mcs/bio/mg-rast/prod/FIGDisk/dist/releases/mgrast_release_3_0_2/common/lib/Babel/lib/Babel.pm > line 29 > > Does that mean that I have to re-annotate all my metagenomes, i.e. submit > them as new jobs? > Thank you > > Tanya. > > > Andreas Wilke > Argonne National Laboratory > Mathematics and Computer Science Division > Bldg. 240 , 4F8 > 9700 South Cass Avenue > Argonne, IL 60439 > (630) 252-3190 (phone) > (630) 252-5986.(fax) > >

1 0

Re: [mg-rast] dataset not moving?
by Mark D'Souza 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

Hi, The problem is the fasta files end in a ^Z end-of-file character which is being misinterpreted by the system. The simplest fix for now would be to remove this character and resubmit the files -- open with a plain simple text editor, go to the end of the file, delete everything after the last sequence character even if nothing is visible, you may lose a line break which you can add back in, then save, that should take care of it. -- Regards, Mark D'Souza -- for the MG-RAST team mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov http://metagenomics.anl.gov/ If you need to respond to this email please address it to the mailing-list mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scot E Dowd PhD" <sdowd(a)pathogenresearch.org> > To: mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov > Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 11:01:52 AM > Subject: [mg-rast] dataset not moving? > Hiya Guys, > > Submitted a few datasets yesterday. Not sure if there is a problem but > the page indicated 10 minutes to process but it is about 18hrs later > and still same stage. I have refreshed the page as of this morning and > I am using Firefox ;-) > > username is scotedowd > > > > Scot E Dowd PhD > > Director > > Research and Testing Laboratory > > > > > > 4321 Marsha Sharp Fwy > > Lubbock, TX 79407 > > 806-789-6879 > > sdowd(a)pathogenresearch.org > > Confidentiality. > > This electronic transmission is strictly confidential to the sender > and intended solely for the addressee. It may contain information > which is covered by legal, professional or other privilege. If you are > not the intended addressee, or someone authorized by the intended > addressee to receive transmissions on behalf of the addressee, you > must not retain, disclose in any form, copy or take any action in > reliance on this transmission. If you have received this transmission > in error, please notify the sender as soon as possible and destroy > this message. Research and Testing Laboratory reserves the right to > amend statements made herein in the event of a mistake.

1 0

Re: [mg-rast] question about MG-RAST 3
by Scott Weese 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

Jared Thanks for continuing to work on these. I have a few questions. With the same sequence file on V2, if you look at the sequence length histogram, there are only 113 sequences less than 50 bp, and the vast majority are ~500. On V2, if I set the minimum alignment length to 200, the number of classified sequences only drops from 17581 to 17374. I'm having the same problem with various other sequences, where the number of sequences that are being analysed are quite different between the two systems. I might be missing something, but it doesn't seem to be a sequence problem given the discrepancies between the two systems. I also re-uploaded a job and compared it to the version that was uploaded shortly after V3 launched. The results are dramatically different (with the recent results making complete sense and looking very good). The recent one has >20000 classified bacteria while the old one has ~2000. The species identifications and diversity also make much more sense. Do you think it's worth dumping all of the file we've uploaded and trying them all again? Thanks again for your help. Scott On 2011-04-06, at 12:50 PM, Jared Wilkening wrote: > Marcio, > > The reason for the quantities of hits you are getting out of v3 is due to 14921 of the 17027 sequences are prefix identical at a length of 50 bp. If your data is amplicon 16s this is to be expected and the jobs would simply need to be rerun without de-replication. If it shotgun metagenomics this is a strong indication of an issue with the sequencing (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19587772) > > Let me know and we can get this sorted out. > > Cheers, > Jared > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Jared Wilkening <jared(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > Marcio, > > You are right there is something a little bit odd about these jobs. > > From the website I do see that that the protein search came up with about just as many hits as the rna search (http://metagenomics.anl.gov/metagenomics.cgi?page=MetagenomeOverview&metage…) Is this amplicon or shotgun metagenomic data? > > The other odd thing is later run through the system (4454965.3) only 2104 sequences passed the quality filtering. Which actually lines up nicely with the combine number of hits found between protein and rna. Potentially this could be a sequence quality issue? > > I'm having trouble logging into our system from home tonight so I can't get at any more details than that but I will take closer look tomorrow. A side note, in the future if you could address emails to mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov we would appreciate it. This will make sure you get an answer quickly in case one of us it on vacation or unavailable. > > Cheers, > Jared > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Marcio Costa <costam(a)uoguelph.ca> wrote: > Dear Jared, > > I have a question about a metagenomic study of the bacterial 16S r-RNA that we had uploaded (4454965.3) on MG-RAST. This job just became available to me on the new version, however, despite been showed that it had 17,593 sequences analyzed on the browse metagenomes page, it gives only around 1000 reads on the metagenome analysis page. In addition, when I compare the results with the previous version of MG-RAST, they are completely different, even using the same dataset (RDP). This same file has been uploaded in the new version (4459773.3), but even less sequences are showed (around 600). > > The same issue has happened with several other files we had previously loaded. > > Please let me know your thoughts. > > Thank you, > > Marcio. > > > J Scott Weese DVM DVSc DipACVIM Dept of Pathobiology Ontario Veterinary College University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario http://www.wormsandgermsblog.com http://www.equidblog.com

1 0

Re: [mg-rast] question about MG-RAST 3
by Jared Wilkening 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

Marcio, The reason for the quantities of hits you are getting out of v3 is due to 14921 of the 17027 sequences are prefix identical at a length of 50 bp. If your data is amplicon 16s this is to be expected and the jobs would simply need to be rerun without de-replication. If it shotgun metagenomics this is a strong indication of an issue with the sequencing ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19587772) Let me know and we can get this sorted out. Cheers, Jared On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Jared Wilkening <jared(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > Marcio, > > You are right there is something a little bit odd about these jobs. > > From the website I do see that that the protein search came up with about > just as many hits as the rna search ( > http://metagenomics.anl.gov/metagenomics.cgi?page=MetagenomeOverview&metage…) Is > this amplicon or shotgun metagenomic data? > > The other odd thing is later run through the system (4454965.3) only 2104 > sequences passed the quality filtering. Which actually lines up nicely with > the combine number of hits found between protein and rna. Potentially this > could be a sequence quality issue? > > I'm having trouble logging into our system from home tonight so I can't get > at any more details than that but I will take closer look tomorrow. A side > note, in the future if you could address emails to mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov we > would appreciate it. This will make sure you get an answer quickly in case > one of us it on vacation or unavailable. > > Cheers, > Jared > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Marcio Costa <costam(a)uoguelph.ca> wrote: > >> Dear Jared, >> >> I have a question about a metagenomic study of the bacterial 16S r-RNA >> that we had uploaded (4454965.3) on MG-RAST. This job just became available >> to me on the new version, however, despite been showed that it had 17,593 >> sequences analyzed on the browse metagenomes page, it gives only around 1000 >> reads on the metagenome analysis page. In addition, when I compare the >> results with the previous version of MG-RAST, they are completely different, >> even using the same dataset (RDP). This same file has been uploaded in the >> new version (4459773.3), but even less sequences are showed (around 600). >> >> The same issue has happened with several other files we had previously >> loaded. >> >> Please let me know your thoughts. >> >> Thank you, >> >> Marcio. >> >> >

1 0

Re: [mg-rast] metagenome analysis/organism classification/barchart option does not work 06042011
by Tobias Paczian 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

I have committed a patched version of WebApplication/WebComponent/VerticalBarChart.pm MGRAST/WebPage/Analysis.pm to CVS. They will solve the problem. Cheers Tobi On Apr 6, 2011, at 11:15 AM, Tobias Paczian wrote: > Jared and I found the bug and I'll hotfix it. I'll ping when I'm done. > > Cheers > Tobi > > On Apr 6, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Mark D'Souza wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We are looking into this, thanks for letting us know about the >> problem. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Vladimir Sentchilo" <vladimir.sentchilo(a)unil.ch> >>> To: mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 8:51:49 AM >>> Subject: [mg-rast] metagenome analysis/organism classification/ >>> barchart option does not work 06042011 >>> Hello MGRAST team >>> Thank you for great server... >>> Today there are some problems with barchart drawing option. >>> In fact, chart has no bars and also clicking on classification >>> categories return false unfolding, for example click on Bacteria >>> returns >>> Archea group unfolded. >>> >>> Best regards >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Mark D'Souza >> -- for the MG-RAST team >> >> mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov >> http://metagenomics.anl.gov/ >> >> If you need to respond to this email please address it to the >> mailing-list mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov >

1 0

Re: [mg-rast] metagenome analysis/organism classification/barchart option does not work 06042011
by Tobias Paczian 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

Jared and I found the bug and I'll hotfix it. I'll ping when I'm done. Cheers Tobi On Apr 6, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Mark D'Souza wrote: > Hi, > > We are looking into this, thanks for letting us know about the > problem. > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Vladimir Sentchilo" <vladimir.sentchilo(a)unil.ch> >> To: mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov >> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 8:51:49 AM >> Subject: [mg-rast] metagenome analysis/organism classification/ >> barchart option does not work 06042011 >> Hello MGRAST team >> Thank you for great server... >> Today there are some problems with barchart drawing option. >> In fact, chart has no bars and also clicking on classification >> categories return false unfolding, for example click on Bacteria >> returns >> Archea group unfolded. >> >> Best regards > > -- > Regards, > Mark D'Souza > -- for the MG-RAST team > > mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov > http://metagenomics.anl.gov/ > > If you need to respond to this email please address it to the > mailing-list mg-rast(a)mcs.anl.gov

1 0