October 2011 - Safety - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Fwd: Parking Lot Pics for safety
by Jim Feigl 30 Nov '11

30 Nov '11

Begin forwarded message: > From: Scott Ehling <sehling(a)mcs.anl.gov> > Date: September 1, 2011 3:55:56 PM CDT > To: Jim Feigl <feigl(a)mcs.anl.gov> > Cc: Marc Snir <snir(a)mcs.anl.gov>, Judy Stickels <stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov> > Subject: Fwd: Parking Lot Pics for safety > > Jim, per Rick's request the following 5 pictures show areas of > safety concern that I believe need to be addressed. > > Pictures 1,2, 4, 5 show the need for curbs around the islands in the > 240 parking lot. Numerous times cars and especially buses cut the > corners causing big divots which then cause mud and slippery > conditions to occur. > > Picture #3 shows the main straightaway of the 240 parking lot where > I feel it needs at least 1 if not 2 speed bumps. I have had a few > close encounters with people driving way too fast in either > direction. IMO it is just a matter of time before someone or > another car gets into an accident. By the time you back out it is > too late. > > Scott > > Scott A. Ehling > Executive Assistant - Budget and Finance > Mathematics and Computer Science Division > Argonne National Laboratory > 9700 S. Cass Ave. > Lemont, IL 60439 > Phone: (630) 252-3338 > Email: sehling(a)mcs.anl.gov > > > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Carolyn Peters <cpeters(a)mcs.anl.gov> >> Date: September 1, 2011 3:43:57 PM CDT >> To: Scott Ehling <sehling(a)mcs.anl.gov> >> Subject: Parking Lot Pics >> >> Here they are...not bad.

2 2

Fwd: hope someone's head didn't do this......
by Jim Feigl 11 Nov '11

11 Nov '11

Begin forwarded message: > From: Rick Stevens <stevens(a)anl.gov> > Date: September 15, 2011 3:23:57 PM CDT > To: Jim Feigl <feigl(a)mcs.anl.gov> > Subject: Fwd: hope someone's head didn't do this...... > > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Rick Stevens <stevens(a)anl.gov> >> Subject: Re: hope someone's head didn't do this...... >> Date: September 15, 2011 4:02:31 PM EDT >> To: "Hanson, Deborah K." <dkhanson(a)anl.gov> >> Cc: "Trychta, Keith" <ktrychta(a)anl.gov>, "Giometti, Carol S." <csgiometti(a)anl.gov >> >, "Stevens, Rick L." <stevens(a)anl.gov> >> >> good catch Debbie! >> >> >> On Sep 15, 2011, at 3:41 PM, Hanson, Deborah K. wrote: >> >>> Keith, Carol, and Rick – >>> >>> I noticed that one of the coat racks that is located outside of >>> 202/B169 has a decided slant, caused by the fact that the top bolt >>> has pulled out of the wall. I hope that impact with someone’s >>> head was not the cause of this! >>> >>> Debbie >>> <detached coat rack closeup.JPG><detached coat rack.JPG> >> >

2 2

Fwd: Recommended Location of Speed Bumps
by Judy Stickels 27 Oct '11

27 Oct '11

How do we want to proceed? Phil brings up some very valid points. Begin forwarded message: > From: "Rash, Philip C." <PRash(a)anl.gov> > Subject: FW: Recommended Location of Speed Bumps > Date: October 27, 2011 11:34:12 AM CDT > To: "Stickels, Judith K." <stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov> > Cc: "Clarke, Charles J." <cjclarke(a)anl.gov>, "Dely, Gregory" <gdely(a)anl.gov>, "Russell, Edward F." <efr(a)aps.anl.gov>, "Gradle, Thomas A." <thomas.gradle(a)ch.doe.gov>, "Rada, Sylvia M." <srada(a)anl.gov>, "Rash, Philip C." <PRash(a)anl.gov>, "Schumann, Craig" <craig.schumann(a)ch.doe.gov>, "Sullivan, Casey J." <csullivan(a)anl.gov> > > Hi Judy, > > Your facility parking area as you know is not within the Lab’s operations or security control for traffic safety. > > However, I am not in favor of speed bumps here at the Laboratory. > > While they will slow cars down, if not constructed properly, you could have issues with car damage. > > During snow removal operations, they will likely be damaged. I would consult with your snow removal company. They do use smaller equipment. The Laboratory uses much larger equipment. > > I also suggest that the speed bumps will be tripping hazards for personnel walking through the parking lot. Why not just ask your employees to drive slow in the parking lot. > > Perhaps if it is such a big problem, perhaps, the lanes in the lot should be shortened and dead-ended so the distance is not very long and this would eliminate people driving through. I do not know if this is really a good idea. It would likely make the people that drive careful mad. > > As for your locations, if you put them in, it would seem OK at the east entrance for one lane but not the North lane. In addition, the speed bump there would positively impact the storm water control problem at the east end of your parking lot where cars drive off of Northgate road into your parking lot. As for at the west end of the lanes, the cars are already slowing down at the intersection. Common sense and standard vehicle operation should be in use so a bump at the end will not help those that need help. Perhaps, they should be in the mid point of the lanes , so cars cannot get going beyond the standard 10 MPH speed limit in parking lots before having to slow down. As for the main entrance lane, that is already a short distance. If they are speeding, they will just speed up between bumps. > > Perhaps a peer review group should stand outside and document the instances where speeding in the parking lot is an issue and report this info to you. > > Just some thoughts. > > Phil > > > From: Judy Stickels [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 11:08 AM > To: Rash, Philip C. > Cc: Jim Feigl; Papka, Michael > Subject: Recommended Location of Speed Bumps > > Hi Phil, > > We would appreciate your feedback regarding number and location of speed bumps for our B240 east parking lot. There are 6 locations that have been proposed (circled in red). Would you recommend more/less? Would you recommend relocation of any of these -- maybe 20-30' into aisle? These are all main entry points. Some of the issues have been: > driving too fast through the aisles > not looking at crossover of main drive > not slowing down at loading dock and or pedestrian walkway > > Before we move ahead, we'd like your expert opinion. Thanks! > > --Judy > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: pr-3180-color(a)mcs.anl.gov > Subject: Attached Image > Date: October 26, 2011 11:11:30 AM CDT > To: stickels(a)zimbra.anl.gov > > > > Judy Stickels > Manager, TCS Building Operations > MCS/240, Rm. 3142 > Argonne National Laboratory > 9700 South Cass Avenue > Argonne, IL 60439 > 630-252-3369 (voice) > stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov > > Judy Stickels Manager, TCS Building Operations MCS/240, Rm. 3142 Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 630-252-3369 (voice) stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov

1 0

Fwd: Recommended Location of Speed Bumps
by Jim Feigl 27 Oct '11

27 Oct '11

All: As a fyi, research on the speed bumps is being done. As soon as we have completed our review will pass on to you various options. jim Begin forwarded message: > From: Judy Stickels <stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov> > Subject: Recommended Location of Speed Bumps > Date: October 26, 2011 11:07:33 AM CDT > To: "Philip C. Rash" <PRash(a)anl.gov> > Cc: Jim Feigl <feigl(a)mcs.anl.gov>, "Michael E. Papka" <papka(a)anl.gov> > > Hi Phil, > > We would appreciate your feedback regarding number and location of speed bumps for our B240 east parking lot. There are 6 locations that have been proposed (circled in red). Would you recommend more/less? Would you recommend relocation of any of these -- maybe 20-30' into aisle? These are all main entry points. Some of the issues have been: > driving too fast through the aisles > not looking at crossover of main drive > not slowing down at loading dock and or pedestrian walkway > > Before we move ahead, we'd like your expert opinion. Thanks! > > --Judy > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: pr-3180-color(a)mcs.anl.gov >> Subject: Attached Image >> Date: October 26, 2011 11:11:30 AM CDT >> To: stickels(a)zimbra.anl.gov >> > > > Judy Stickels > Manager, TCS Building Operations > MCS/240, Rm. 3142 > Argonne National Laboratory > 9700 South Cass Avenue > Argonne, IL 60439 > 630-252-3369 (voice) > stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov >

1 0

FW: Fwd: Another Safety Concern re Walkway to Cafeteria
by Dyrkacz, Gary R. 26 Oct '11

26 Oct '11

Chuck and Matt, As part of the push for ALDs to take on safety issues, the issue below ended up in the CELS ALD list of items to resolve. Upon reviewing it, we just realized this is an employee of CEP. We are transferring the issue to you for resolution. Sorry about the long delay in sending it on. We just met a bit more than a week ago and assigned a long list of safety issues to ourselves to review and disposition. I ended up with this one and just now got to it. Patricia has a point. We also brought this point up a couple of months ago, but it is not clear if it is still on anyone's plate to resolve. The street would be fine if they did a good job of patching many of the deep cracks. Lt is not clear whether they intended to do this at the same time the trench they dug across the road is paved over. (If they are going to pave it over this year.) Either Pat Hogan or Phil Rash may have some insight. Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333 From: safety-bounces(a)lists.cels.anl.gov [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Feigl Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 4:43 PM To: safety(a)lists.cels.anl.gov Subject: [Safety] Fwd: Another Safety Concern re Walkway to Cafeteria From: "Hollopeter, Patricia E." <PHollopeter(a)anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: September 7, 2011 8:49:42 AM CDT To: "Stickels, Judith K." <stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: RE: Pick-up truck needs to be moved Judy: I've been meaning to contact you regarding walking to the cafeteria safely from Bldg. 240. Currently, it is not good. They made a nice sidewalk from our end, but once you're off it, the pavement is very uneven and once you hit the barriers, it's up for grabs as to where one should go. I strongly believe that they should construct a similar sidewalk from the barriers to the existing sidewalk. This could be especially dangerous in winter. Thanks. Pat Judy Stickels Manager, TCS Building Operations MCS/240, Rm. 3142 Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 630-252-3369 (voice) stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>

2 1

FW: FW: Safety suggestions - followup from Rick's safety meeting
by Dyrkacz, Gary R. 26 Oct '11

26 Oct '11

Michael, Please see my comments below regarding several of your safety comments. Some of your original comments have been omitted; they have parsed them out for resolution to the appropriate organizations. You should be hearing about the disposition of the other comments hopefully in another couple of weeks. I am addressing those that I can handle. Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333 From: safety-bounces(a)lists.cels.anl.gov [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dyrkacz, Gary R. Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 2:06 PM To: safety(a)lists.cels.anl.gov Subject: [Safety] FW: Safety suggestions - followup from Rick's safety meeting Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333 From: Lillian Ruscic [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 3:03 PM To: Wilde, Michael J. Cc: Stickels, Judith K.; Dyrkacz, Gary R. Subject: Re: Safety suggestions - followup from Rick's safety meeting Thank you Mike for your great ideas. I will get together with Judy to determine how to best address your suggestions. Lillian Ruscic ESH QA Coordinator for CELS, LCF & MCS B240 AES 2-4471 ________________________________ From: "Michael Wilde" <wilde(a)mcs.anl.gov> To: "Judy Stickels" <stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov>, "Lillian Ruscic" <lruscic(a)cels.anl.gov> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 12:42:28 PM Subject: Safety suggestions - followup from Rick's safety meeting Dear Judy and Lillian, As a followup to Rick's request to submit suggestions for enhancing workplace safety, I've collected the following ideas. Please note that this is in the spirit of the intense scrutiny that Rick requested; some of the observations below are perhaps overly cautious and do not necessarily merit actions, but I assume that these will of course be filtered out by the people scrutinizing the collected suggestions. Regards, - Mike Low prio: Maybe Im too paranoid here, but Im always worried about dropping something off the 5th floor catwalks. Especially something like a coffee cup slipping out of my hand, or breaking on the floor and the shards hurting someone below. Im surprised that the metalwork on the catwalk railings leaves such a large gap at the floor. Maybe rugs on the catwalks could reduce the risk of breaking or falling objects? I checked on the catwalks. None of them cross over occupied spaces in such a manner as to present a danger to occupants below. It is unlikely anything falling off or shattering on the catwalk would reach someone walking either on the lower catwalks. The traffic on the catwalks is also generally low. In the event of a shattering cup or glass, the possibility of glass shards spraying to adjacent areas is somewhat higher, but this is only true for a small region at one end of the catwalks. At those points the areas below and to the side are paths and not continuously occupied. I think the occupied areas are recessed sufficiently to minimize any contact with flying shards. You comment regarding the open structure is a good one, but again because of the low traffic and minimum impact to safety, I do not believe the cost of remedying this is something the Divisions would be willing to bear. Similarly: the large wood planks on the railing add a nice warm touch to the concrete of the interior; I assume that these are meant for people to chat at and set down their coffee cups on? But I've always been similarly surprised that these planks don't have any backstop on them, especially the ones on the higher floors. Aesthetically they are very nice; this is just my paranoid safety concern. Maybe a 2" backsplash out of matching wood? The same comment as above really applies here. From a safety perspective, I don’t see a problem. Certainly a cup falling down might make a mess in the stone, depending what it is filled with. I only offer these perhaps overly-cautious observations in the spirit requested by Rick. Not all your comments are overly cautious. Several are spot on and are being discussed for a resolution. All comments are appreciated. Regards, - Mike -- Michael Wilde Computation Institute, University of Chicago Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Laboratory

2 1

FW: FW: Safety suggestions - followup from Rick's safety meeting
by Dyrkacz, Gary R. 26 Oct '11

26 Oct '11

Hi Jim and Judy, Several items needing 240 attention: Item 1 on the edge of the outside stairs is one that has bothered a few people, and I have to admit I have noticed the problem in very bright sunlight, especially at noon. I am not sure more lighting and salt is the answer; the strip idea is the best one. There are ridges cut into the concrete just above the stairs, but in bright sunlight and from Michaels comments at night there is an issue realizing there are stairs there. Has there been any movement on Michael Wilde’s last comment regarding the marking of a pedestrian path? I will be answering the catwalk issue and a similar issue Michael had related to using the oak slabs and stuff falling off. The catwalks and oak shelves do not go over occupied space. Might make a mess in the stones, but that is about it. Although I will leave the issue of the brush fire for one of you to answer, my own view is that this is indeed a very remote possibility. The bigger issue would be the burning vehicle that caused the brush fire. Normal engine heat would not be a problem. At least I have never heard of a hot (non burning) engine in reasonable running condition causing a brush fire. [Jim, remember to submit the final outcome of these questions to the cels safety list.] Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333 From: "Michael Wilde" <wilde(a)mcs.anl.gov> To: "Judy Stickels" <stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov>, "Lillian Ruscic" <lruscic(a)cels.anl.gov> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 12:42:28 PM Subject: Safety suggestions - followup from Rick's safety meeting Dear Judy and Lillian, …stuff that is FMS responsibility deleted here… already sent Building 240 ------------ The 240 entry walkway, as you walk out and down to the left: in winter, when the light is low or in the dark, its a bit hard to see the edge of the steps. Also on very icy days, the pitch of the walkway can make it quite slippery. Maybe assess this when winter comes around? More lighting, or salt/sand applied by 240 maint staff; maybe something to make the stairs less "invisible" like a subtle aesthetic paint stripe on the edge? (Something visible, but not the back-end-yellow warning stripe ;) Low prio: Maybe Im too paranoid here, but Im always worried about dropping something off the 5th floor catwalks. Especially something like a coffee cup slipping out of my hand, or breaking on the floor and the shards hurting someone below. Im surprised that the metalwork on the catwalk railings leaves such a large gap at the floor. Maybe rugs on the catwalks could reduce the risk of breaking or falling objects? …More stuff I will answer deleted here. Other even-more paranoid observations: many 240 parking lot rows border grassy areas, where cars parking too close to high dry brush in hot weather might cause a fire. Add concrete bumper stops? (Probably way too paranoid to justify the cost; driver caution is probably all thats needed. Or: just have these areas mowed lower, and more often (despite the fact that aesthetically I welcome the natural tall-brush look). And: In the main stairway to the 5th floor (the one from the main entrance by the cafe) - there's a sizable gap from the edge of the concrete stairs to the wall, about 2". Seems like a woman's or child's shoe could get caught in there if they were, say, crowded to the edge of the stair to make room for someone or just walking with other people. Other buildings --------------- stuff about 203 deleted, GRD sort of handling… Lastly: others have commented on the list that the walking route from 240 to the cafeteria and 201 needs to be much more clearly marked, and I strongly agree. So again, thank you both for maintaining what I feel is an excellent and safe work environment; I only offer these perhaps overly-cautious observations in the spirit requested by Rick. Regards, - Mike -- Michael Wilde Computation Institute, University of Chicago Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Laboratory

2 1

FW: FW: Safety suggestions - followup from Rick's safety meeting
by Dyrkacz, Gary R. 26 Oct '11

26 Oct '11

Ian and Mike, See Michaels safety concern below. It is the “Division” that will have to pay to cut back the spine or answer Michael as to why it does not compromise safety and will not be done. Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333 From: safety-bounces(a)lists.cels.anl.gov [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dyrkacz, Gary R. Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 2:06 PM To: safety(a)lists.cels.anl.gov Subject: [Safety] FW: Safety suggestions - followup from Rick's safety meeting Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333 ________________________________ From: "Michael Wilde" <wilde(a)mcs.anl.gov> To: "Judy Stickels" <stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov>, "Lillian Ruscic" <lruscic(a)cels.anl.gov> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 12:42:28 PM Subject: Safety suggestions - followup from Rick's safety meeting GRD…stuff deleted and being parsed to appropriate person or organization. On the 5th floor, there is a gray electrical raceway installed right across what on other floors is a walkway. As its the clearest walkway to the restrooms, conference rooms, and library, we all step over this ~18"-high raceway; someone is going to trip doing that some day, and its right by a railing, making it easy to drop something over the edge in the process. Plus its distracting to the person whose desk is right there. Can this panel either be truncated to make a true walking path there, or blocked off so people don't walk that way? So again, thank you both for maintaining what I feel is an excellent and safe work environment; I only offer these perhaps overly-cautious observations in the spirit requested by Rick. Regards, - Mike -- Michael Wilde Computation Institute, University of Chicago Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Laboratory

1 0

FW: FW: Safety suggestions - followup from Rick's safety meeting
by Dyrkacz, Gary R. 26 Oct '11

26 Oct '11

Gail, In response to the calls for issues to be brought to the ALDs attention, we are reviewing and trying to manage the safety improvements that staff have submitted to the CELS ALD Office. The following were comments to Rick regarding road safety issues that were submitted from Michael Wilde. You can send a response on the disposition of the safety issue either to me or to Michael. If you send a response directly to Michael , please copy me on the response, so I can close out this item on our internal database. Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333 From: safety-bounces(a)lists.cels.anl.gov [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dyrkacz, Gary R. Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 2:06 PM To: safety(a)lists.cels.anl.gov Subject: [Safety] FW: Safety suggestions - followup from Rick's safety meeting ________________________________ From: "Michael Wilde" <wilde(a)mcs.anl.gov> To: "Judy Stickels" <stickels(a)mcs.anl.gov>, "Lillian Ruscic" <lruscic(a)cels.anl.gov> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 12:42:28 PM Subject: Safety suggestions - followup from Rick's safety meeting Dear Judy and Lillian, As a followup to Rick's request to submit suggestions for enhancing workplace safety, I've collected the following ideas. Please note that this is in the spirit of the intense scrutiny that Rick requested; some of the observations below are perhaps overly cautious and do not necessarily merit actions, but I assume that these will of course be filtered out by the people scrutinizing the collected suggestions. Regards, - Mike Traffic safety -------------- Bikes: The roadway from Cass to the main entrance seems to me to be hazardous to bike riders, especially with increased construction traffic. I recently saw a bike rider almost forced off the shoulder by a truck that did not give the rider sufficient room. The problems are: - the edge of the roadway is in most places is in terrible condition - we should have larger warning sign(s) to motorists at the Cass entrance to watch for bikes - we should restripe the roadway - both centerline and shoulder stripes - the transition from roadway to gravel shoulder should be more bike-friendly - ideally we should create a narrow but clear bike lane at the shoulders - also more clear warning signs where the Waterfall Glen trails cross the roadway Deer: Leaving at dusk and early evening I often see deer on the side of the road; the red notice sign at the guardhouse could warn motorists to watch for deer more often, especially at the time and seasons when they are most frequently out. Cass exit: Making a left turn from the main roadway to northbound Cass (ie towards I55) at rush hour is often congested with Argonne traffic. Some warning signage on Cass about cars exiting might help reduce the temptation for Argonne drivers making fast left turns to squeeze out. Perhaps we can get whatever agency maintains that stretch of Cass (state, county?) to also re-stripe it, because its hard to visually gauge whether traffic coming up Cass from the south is in the left or right northbound lane, and hence hard to gauge when its safe to make a left. Its not clear that better striping would help; but maybe a state traffic engineer could assess the intersection? …stuff for CELS to deal with omitted So again, thank you both for maintaining what I feel is an excellent and safe work environment; I only offer these perhaps overly-cautious observations in the spirit requested by Rick. Regards, - Mike -- Michael Wilde Computation Institute, University of Chicago Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Laboratory

1 0

Re: [Safety] Safety Items from Facility Inspection
by Dyrkacz, Gary R. 25 Oct '11

25 Oct '11

Bill, Please make sure my response gets back to the those who brought up the issues. At the time of the email, there was a fair amount of construction debris on the roadways. A lot of material was being moved from the ESB construction site and probably a couple of other Site areas as well. A check on 10/24/2011 showed that the debris issue is at a minimum. The debris can certainly vary on a daily basis, but it seems to be mostly in check right now. I observed a few days ago that the ESB contractor has been using a Bobcat with a brush attachment to keep 95th St clean. Yesterday they were adding water to keep the dust down. A trip down 94th showed the roadway (and shoulder such as it is) to be fairly clean. Once they start pouring large amounts of concrete at ESB and backfilling, the issue may again come up, but we will have to wait and see. The issue regarding drivers not obeying Argonne traffic rules has come up several times recently. The Director's Safety Council has discussed this and I understand there has been some effort to have security increase monitoring of the roadways. The problem seems to be more related to Argonne staff rather than contractors. If you continue to see a high level of traffic issues, let me know and we will push management to address the issue again. Gary Dyrkacz Computing, Environment & Life Sciences ALD ESH Representative Bldg 240 Rm: 4125 Ph: 2-7478 FAX: 2-6333 From: Gasper, William R. Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 4:13 PM To: Dyrkacz, Gary R. Cc: Krummel, John R.; Ditmars, John D. Subject: Safety Items from Facility Inspection Gary, Thank you for assisting EVS management yesterday with the facility inspection of EVS space on the 5th & 6th floors of Building 240. During the inspection EVS employees were asked if they had any concerns or ideas relating to safety at Argonne. Several responses included traffic safety related topics summarized below: 1. Due in part to the ongoing construction activities around the site, roadways, including paved shoulders, are littered with gravel and debris. This presents a hazard for bicyclist, pedestrians and vehicles. Of particular note are the shoulders along West Gate Rd. west of Outer Circle. Here the shoulders are used extensively by bicyclists and pedestrians. 2. Directly related to construction activities at the ESB site, nearby roadways have been layered with dirt, mud, gravel, etc. In particular 94th St., Outer Circle (west) to West Gate and the site landfill area. 3. Lab-wide there is a general lack of compliance with traffic rules by drivers of vehicles. This includes, but not limited to, signal lights, stop signs, lane usage and speed limits. Please contact me if you have any questions. Bill

1 0